Perceptual and neural consequences of rapid motion adaptation

Nervous systems adapt to the prevailing sensory environment, and the consequences of this adaptation can be observed in the responses of single neurons and in perception. Given the variety of timescales underlying events in the natural world, determining the temporal characteristics of adaptation is important to understanding how perception adjusts to its sensory environment. Previous work has shown that neural adaptation can occur on a timescale of milliseconds, but perceptual adaptation has generally been studied over relatively long timescales, typically on the order of seconds. This disparity raises important questions. Can perceptual adaptation be observed at brief, functionally relevant timescales? And if so, how do its properties relate to the rapid adaptation seen in cortical neurons? We address these questions in the context of visual motion processing, a perceptual modality characterized by rapid temporal dynamics. We demonstrate objectively that 25 ms of motion adaptation is sufficient to generate a motion aftereffect, an illusory sensation of movement experienced when a moving stimulus is replaced by a stationary pattern. This rapid adaptation occurs regardless of whether the adapting motion is perceived. In neurophysiological recordings from the middle temporal area of primate visual cortex, we find that brief motion adaptation evokes direction-selective responses to subsequently presented stationary stimuli. A simple model shows that these neural responses can explain the consequences of rapid perceptual adaptation. Overall, we show that the motion aftereffect is not merely an intriguing perceptual illusion, but rather a reflection of rapid neural and perceptual processes that can occur essentially every time we experience motion.

[1]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Processing of Motion in Macaque Middle Temporal and Medial Superior Temporal Visual Cortical Areas , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Raymond,et al.  Successive episodes produce direction contrast effects in motion perception , 1998, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[4]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Dynamics of Spatial Distortions Reveal Multiple Time Scales of Motion Adaptation , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Baker,et al.  Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  E. Seidemann,et al.  Effect of spatial attention on the responses of area MT neurons. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Kazushi Maruya,et al.  Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[8]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Bart Krekelberg,et al.  Adaptation in macaque MT reduces perceived speed and improves speed discrimination. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. J. Keck,et al.  Recovery from Adaptation to Moving Gratings , 1977, Perception.

[11]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Valentin Dragoi,et al.  Adaptive coding of visual information in neural populations , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Amy A. Rezec,et al.  Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments , 2004, Vision Research.

[14]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[15]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) predicts the attentional blink , 2008 .

[16]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Spatiotemporal Structure of Nonlinear Subunits in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[19]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Motion adaptation in area MT. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[22]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The motion aftereffect , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  R. Born,et al.  Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area , 1993, Nature.

[25]  Bart G Borghuis,et al.  Temporal dynamics of direction tuning in motion-sensitive macaque area MT. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal responses in macaque MT and VIP during motion detection , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  R Blake,et al.  Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Movshon,et al.  Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[29]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  S. Petersen,et al.  Direction-specific adaptation in area MT of the owl monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[31]  S. Suzuki,et al.  Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity? , 2001, Vision Research.

[32]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[33]  C. M. D. de Weert,et al.  On Interocular Transfer of Motion Aftereffects , 1993, Perception.

[34]  C. Schwarz,et al.  Spatiotemporal effects of microstimulation in rat neocortex: a parametric study using multielectrode recordings. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code , 2001, Nature.

[36]  James J. Clark,et al.  Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts , 2002, Vision Research.

[37]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[38]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. I. the role of input and intrinsic mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Blake,et al.  Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect , 1993, Vision Research.

[40]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. II. tuning of neural circuit mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  C. Law,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Pattern Motion Selectivity of Spiking Outputs and Local Field Potentials in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[45]  K. H. Britten,et al.  A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Pinkus,et al.  Probing Visual Motion Signals with a Priming Paradigm , 1997, Vision Research.

[47]  A. Fairhall,et al.  Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation , 2009, Neuron.

[48]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Behavioral time course of microstimulation in cortical area MT. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  G. Campana,et al.  Separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order patterns revealed by rapid forms of visual motion priming and motion aftereffect. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[50]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. , 1999, Science.

[51]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[52]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[53]  William A. Simpson,et al.  Temporal summation of visual motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[54]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization , 2005, Vision Research.

[55]  J. Movshon,et al.  Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[57]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects , 2007, Vision Research.

[58]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[59]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  Maninder K. Kahlon,et al.  Visual Motion Analysis for Pursuit Eye Movements in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[62]  James M. G. Tsui,et al.  Brief motion stimuli preferentially activate surround-suppressed neurons in macaque visual area MT , 2008, Current Biology.

[63]  A. Johnston,et al.  Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect , 1985, Vision Research.

[64]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modeling , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.