The philosophical basis of algorithmic recourse

Philosophers have established that certain ethically important values are modally robust in the sense that they systematically deliver correlative benefits across a range of counterfactual scenarios. In this paper, we contend that recourse - the systematic process of reversing unfavorable decisions by algorithms and bureaucracies across a range of counterfactual scenarios - is such a modally robust good. In particular, we argue that two essential components of a good life - temporally extended agency and trust - are underwritten by recourse. We critique existing approaches to the conceptualization, operationalization and implementation of recourse. Based on these criticisms, we suggest a revised approach to recourse and give examples of how it might be implemented - especially for those who are least well off1.

[1]  Wayne A. Logan.  The Ex Post Facto Clause and the Jurisprudence of Punishment , 1998 .

[2]  John Rawls,et al.  政治自由主义 = Political liberalism , 2000 .

[3]  J. Butler.  Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence , 2004 .

[4]  Adam Phillips.  Down Girl: the Logic of Misogyny by Kate Manne , 2019 .

[5]  Solon Barocas,et al.  The hidden assumptions behind counterfactual explanations and principal reasons , 2019, FAT*.

[6]  John Shields,et al.  It's more than poverty: employment precarity and household well-being , 2013 .

[7]  Solon Barocas,et al.  The Intuitive Appeal of Explainable Machines , 2018 .

[8]  C. Kenneth Waters,et al.  Causes that Make a Difference , 2007 .

[9]  Chris Russell,et al.  Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR , 2017, ArXiv.

[10]  Yang Liu,et al.  Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification , 2018, FAT.

[11]  Anca D. Dragan,et al.  The Social Cost of Strategic Classification , 2018, FAT.

[12]  Mark Alfano,et al.  The Embedded and Extended Character Hypotheses , 2017 .

[13]  Colin Koopman,et al.  How We Became Our Data , 2019 .

[14]  Lon L. Fuller,et al.  The Morality of Law. , 1966 .

[15]  Chris Russell,et al.  Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations , 2019, FAT.

[16]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation , 2018, FAT.

[17]  Peter Westen.  Lex Mitior: Converse ofex post factoand window into criminal desert , 2015 .

[18]  Thomas E. Hill,et al.  Respect, pluralism, and justice : Kantian perspectives , 2000 .

[19]  Suresh Venkatasubramanian,et al.  The (Im)possibility of fairness , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[20]  Oluwasanmi Koyejo,et al.  Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systems , 2019, ArXiv.

[21]  Suresh Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Equalizing Recourse across Groups , 2019, ArXiv.

[22]  J. Dryzek,et al.  Human rights. , 1977, Science.

[23]  Amir-Hossein Karimi,et al.  Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisions , 2019, AISTATS.

[24]  Peter K. Westen.  Lex Mitior: Converse of Ex Post Facto and Window into Criminal Desert , 2015 .

[25]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Strategic Classification , 2015, ITCS.

[26]  Jon A. Carnegie,et al.  Driver’s License Suspensions, Impacts and Fairness Study , 2007 .

[27]  Sldney Axlnn,et al.  Creating the Kingdom of Ends , 2003 .

[28]  Samuel V. Bruton,et al.  Kant's Ethical Thought , 2001 .

[29]  Roger A. Shiner,et al.  The Authority of Law , 1983 .

[30]  Jessica F. Saunders,et al.  How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates , 2020, Sex Roles.

[31]  P. Pettit,et al.  The Robust Demands of the Good: Ethics with Attachment, Virtue, and Respect , 2015 .

[32]  G. Donleavy,et al.  Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk About It) , 2018, Public Integrity.