An addendum on “Robust control of robots by the computed torque method”

We reinterprete and improve recent results on robust control of robots by the computed method. The methods and ideas used are inspired by `passivity based? control methods for robot manipulators and lead to a significant increase in freedom of controller implementation, thereby providing more flexibility to the designer of robot control systems.

[1]  Weiping Li,et al.  Adaptive manipulator control a case study , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Brad Paden,et al.  Globally asymptotically stable ‘PD+’ controller for robot manipulators , 1988 .

[3]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: a tutorial , 1988, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Roberto Horowitz,et al.  Stability and Robustness Analysis of a Class of Adaptive Controllers for Robotic Manipulators , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Harry Berghuis,et al.  Adaptive 'PD+' control of rigid robot manipulators , 1991 .

[6]  J. Wen,et al.  New class of control laws for robotic manipulators Part 1. Non–adaptive case , 1988 .

[7]  J. Y. S. Luh,et al.  Resolved-acceleration control of mechanical manipulators , 1980 .

[8]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Adaptive manipulator control: A case study , 1988 .

[9]  John J. Craig Zhu,et al.  Introduction to robotics mechanics and control , 1991 .

[10]  Lakmal Seneviratne,et al.  Adaptive Control Of Robot Manipulators , 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  J. Slotine,et al.  On the Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators , 1987 .

[12]  D. Dawson,et al.  Robust control of robots by the computed torque law , 1991 .

[13]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Comments on "Adaptive manipulator control: a case study" by J. Slotine and W. Li , 1990 .