The Nature of Analogical Explanations: High School Physics Teachers Use in Kenya

This paper is about a study into the nature of analogies recorded from three Form 2 (Grade 10) classes in Kenya, instructed by three physics teachers. Through a case study method involving classroom observation, several analogies were recorded and analysed. These analogies were predominantly environmental (drawn from students’ socio-cultural environment) and anthropomorphic (life and human characteristics ascribed to analogues involving familiar concepts). A small number were scientific (those in which analogues are drawn from the science knowledge domain) – ones the author, for pedagogical reasons, wishes to see exploited. In addition, targets (concepts to be explained) were not freed from analogues (concepts used to explain), which is problematic. Also recorded were instances of students making statements that contained counter-physics messages. These included statements conveying literal understanding of technical terminology, sense experience understanding, which proved very robust, and obvious transfer of error from a particular knowledge domain to another. Caution is therefore advised to ensure that before developing and deploying analogies, students’ understanding of the analogues must be sought. This most likely will reveal problems in their understanding and should be rectified before applying its meaning to the target.

[1]  Kim Pittman,et al.  Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? , 1999 .

[2]  P. Coetzee,et al.  The African Philosophy Reader , 2004 .

[3]  John J. Clement,et al.  Expert novice similarities and instruction using analogies , 1998 .

[4]  R. Duit On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[5]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[6]  Z. Dagher Analysis of analogies used by science teachers , 1995 .

[7]  David E. Brown,et al.  Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction , 1989 .

[8]  David L. Altheide,et al.  Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[9]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa , 1995 .

[10]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[11]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Science teachers’ use of analogies: observations from classroom practice , 1992 .

[12]  William W. Cobern,et al.  Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education , 1996 .

[13]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[14]  A. Peshkin The Goodness of Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[15]  Hassan Hussein Zeitoun,et al.  Teaching Scientific Analogies: A Proposed Model. , 1984 .

[16]  D. Hodson,et al.  Teaching And Learning Science , 1998 .

[17]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[18]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning. , 1977 .

[19]  Jeffrey W. Bloom Assessing and extending the scope of children's contexts of meaning: context maps as a methodological perspective , 1995 .

[20]  O. Jegede School science and the development of scientific culture: a review of contemporary science education in Africa , 1997 .

[21]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Cross‐cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon , 1999 .

[22]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[23]  O. Jegede,et al.  Towards an elimination of the gender gulf in science concept attainment through the use of environmental analogs , 1997 .

[24]  G. Bodner Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[25]  J. Hamel,et al.  Case Study Methods , 1993 .

[26]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[27]  David F. Treagust,et al.  An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers' analogical explanations , 1994 .

[28]  R. B. Prophet Rhetoric and reality in science curriculum development in Botswana , 1990 .

[29]  Gary J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Educational Research , 1998 .

[30]  V. Mudimbe,et al.  The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge , 1989 .

[31]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Conceptual change cum discourse analysis to understand cognition in a unit on chaotic systems: towards an integrative perspective on learning in science , 1998 .

[32]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[33]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[34]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics , 1993 .

[35]  R. Driver,et al.  The Pupil as Scientist , 1983 .

[36]  Mike Watts,et al.  Humanizing and feminizing school science: reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education , 1994 .

[37]  Thomas A. Schwandt Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. , 1994 .

[38]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The construction and analogical transfer of symbolic visualizations. , 1993 .

[39]  R. Driver,et al.  Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science , 1983 .

[40]  M. R. Matthews Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[41]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[42]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A typology of school science models , 2000 .

[43]  David E. Brown Refocusing Core Intuitions: A Concretizing Role for Analogy in Conceptual Change. , 1993 .

[44]  M. Trow American Higher Education , 1988 .