Limits to compliance and the role of tactile sensing in grasping

Grasping and manipulation in unstructured environments must handle a wide range of object properties and significant sensing errors. Underactuation and compliance have been shown to be an effective way to improve grasping performance under such uncertainty, but the degree of compliance plays an important role in both gently adapting to sensing errors and maintaining stable grasps of heavy objects. These demands limit the range of objects that can be grasped. We consider the role and required characteristics of tactile sensing as a compensation method when compliance alone is insufficient. By strategic use of contact sensing, it is possible to expand the capabilities of a hand to grasp effectively under a wide range of positioning errors using simple position-driven motors and low-cost hardware.

[1]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  S. Srinivasa,et al.  Push-grasping with dexterous hands: Mechanics and a method , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  Robust Object Grasping Using Force Compliant Motion Primitives , 2013 .

[4]  Yoji Umetani,et al.  The Development of Soft Gripper for the Versatile Robot Hand , 1978 .

[5]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  The Highly Adaptive SDM Hand: Design and Performance Evaluation , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: Moving the robots of tomorrow , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Contact sensing and grasping performance of compliant hands , 2010, Auton. Robots.

[8]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Simple, Robust Autonomous Grasping in Unstructured Environments , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Haruhisa Kawasaki,et al.  Dexterous anthropomorphic robot hand with distributed tactile sensor: Gifu hand II , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[10]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  Data-driven optimization for underactuated robotic hands , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  Contact-reactive grasping of objects with partial shape information , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Hong Liu,et al.  DLR-Hand II: next generation of a dextrous robot hand , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[13]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Learning motion primitive goals for robust manipulation , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Towards a design optimization method for reducing the mechanical complexity of underactuated robotic hands , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Shoji Tatsumi,et al.  An assistive tele-operated anthropomorphic robot hand: Osaka City University Hand II , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[16]  Claudio Melchiorri,et al.  UBH 3: an anthropomorphic hand with simplified endo-skeletal structure and soft continuous fingerpads , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.