Electrophysiological evidence of illusory audiovisual speech percept in human infants

How effortlessly and quickly infants acquire their native language remains one of the most intriguing questions of human development. Our study extends this question into the audiovisual domain, taking into consideration visual speech cues, which were recently shown to have more importance for young infants than previously anticipated [Weikum WM, Vouloumanos A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Sebastián-Gallés N, Werker JF (2007) Science 316:1159]. A particularly interesting phenomenon of audiovisual speech perception is the McGurk effect [McGurk H, MacDonald J (1976) Nature 264:746–748], an illusory speech percept resulting from integration of incongruent auditory and visual speech cues. For some phonemes, the human brain does not detect the mismatch between conflicting auditory and visual cues but automatically assimilates them into the closest legal phoneme, sometimes different from both auditory and visual ones. Measuring event-related brain potentials in 5-month-old infants, we demonstrate differential brain responses when conflicting auditory and visual speech cues can be integrated and when they cannot be fused into a single percept. This finding reveals a surprisingly early ability to perceive speech cross-modally and highlights the role of visual speech experience during early postnatal development in learning of the phonemes and phonotactics of the native language.

[1]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[3]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants , 1994, Nature.

[5]  D Boston Hearing lips and seeing voices. , 1977, British journal of audiology.

[6]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life? , 2002, Science.

[7]  I. Winkler,et al.  Processing acoustic change and novelty in newborn infants , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[9]  P. Deltenre,et al.  Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk–MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[11]  I. Winkler,et al.  ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  J. Werker,et al.  Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants? , 2004, Developmental psychobiology.

[13]  Whitney M. Weikum,et al.  Visual Language Discrimination in Infancy , 2007, Science.

[14]  Denis Burnham,et al.  Auditory-visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect. , 2004, Developmental psychobiology.

[15]  C. Nelson,et al.  Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[16]  G Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  A phonological representation in the infant brain , 1998, Neuroreport.

[17]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  A. Wallace Ants and their Ways , 1883, Nature.

[19]  R. Aslin,et al.  Visual speech contributes to phonetic learning in 6-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  R. Hari,et al.  Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  D. Burnham,et al.  Impact of language on development of auditory-visual speech perception. , 2008, Developmental science.

[22]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[23]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Seeing voices: High-density electrical mapping and source-analysis of the multisensory mismatch negativity evoked during the McGurk illusion , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  David Poeppel,et al.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Werker,et al.  Two-month-old infants match phonetic information in lips and voice , 2003 .

[26]  O. Pascalis,et al.  A Domain-General Theory of the Development of Perceptual Discrimination , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[27]  D. Tucker Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  M A Schmuckler,et al.  The McGurk effect in infants. , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M. Sams,et al.  Time course of multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates , 2001, Neuroreport.

[31]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. , 1982, Science.