Young Children Bet on Their Numerical Skills

Metacognition, the ability to assess one’s own knowledge, has been targeted as a critical learning mechanism in mathematics education. Yet the early childhood origins of metacognition have proven difficult to study. Using a novel nonverbal task and a comprehensive set of metacognitive measures, we provided the strongest evidence to date that young children are metacognitive. We showed that children as young as 5 years made metacognitive “bets” on their numerical discriminations in a wagering task. However, contrary to previous reports from adults, our results showed that children’s metacognition is domain specific: Their metacognition in the numerical domain was unrelated to their metacognition in another domain (emotion discrimination). Moreover, children’s metacognitive ability in only the numerical domain predicted their school-based mathematics knowledge. The data provide novel evidence that metacognition is a fundamental, domain-dependent cognitive ability in children. The findings have implications for theories of uncertainty and reveal new avenues for training metacognition in children.

[1]  R. Dolan,et al.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention , 2012 .

[4]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[5]  A. Koriat,et al.  Metacognitive Judgments and their Accuracy , 2002 .

[6]  L. Son,et al.  Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  A. Koriat,et al.  Choice latency as a cue for children's subjective confidence in the correctness of their answers. , 2010, Developmental science.

[8]  A. Schoenfeld.  Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[9]  A. Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Metacognition in Mathematics From a Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[11]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom , 2012 .

[12]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[13]  R. Bjork,et al.  The Integrated Nature of Metamemory and Memory , 2008 .

[14]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognitive Knowledge about Reading. , 1978 .

[15]  W. Schneider.  The Development of Metacognitive Knowledge in Children and Adolescents: Major Trends and Implications for Education , 2008 .

[16]  S. Ghetti,et al.  Metacognitive Development in Early Childhood: New Questions about Old Assumptions , 2010 .

[17]  Melissa L. Allen,et al.  Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test , 2021, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[18]  Susan J. Galvin,et al.  Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Test difficulty and judgment bias , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Caren M Rotello,et al.  Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Inexpert calibration of comprehension , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[22]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Development of Children's Awareness of Their Own Thoughts , 2000 .

[23]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition of Emotional Face Recognition Then the Participants' Overall Metacognitive Judgments about Their , 2022 .

[24]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Mathematics teaching and learning. , 1996 .

[26]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Robert R Hampton,et al.  Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms? , 2009, Comparative cognition & behavior reviews.

[28]  Jessica F Cantlon,et al.  Math, monkeys, and the developing brain , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Transfer of Metacognitive Skills and Hint Seeking in Monkeys , 2007 .

[30]  D. Kuhn.  Metacognitive Development , 2000 .

[31]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[32]  M. Veenman,et al.  Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences , 2005 .

[33]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[34]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Does a General Monitoring Skill Exist , 1995 .

[35]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[36]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[37]  P. Alexander,et al.  Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions , 1989 .

[38]  W. Schneider,et al.  COGNITIVE STRA TEGIES : GOOD STRATEGY USERS COORDINATE METACOGNITION AND KNOWLEDGE , 2010 .

[39]  P. H. Miller,et al.  The Development of Children's Understanding of Attention. , 1979 .

[40]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. , 1985 .

[41]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[42]  Anastasia Efklides,et al.  Trends and prospects in metacognition research , 2010 .

[43]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Repeated testing sessions and scholastic aptitude in college students’ metacognitive accuracy , 2007 .

[44]  D. Kornbrot,et al.  Signal detection theory, the approach of choice: Model-based and distribution-free measures and evaluation , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  L. Gerken,et al.  Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task. , 2008, Developmental science.

[46]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Probabilistic Population Codes for Bayesian Decision Making , 2008, Neuron.

[47]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Age-related differences in adaptive decision making: Sensitivity to expected value in risky choice , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[48]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.