Responsiveness of units in the auditory neostriatum of the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) to species-specific calls and synthetic stimuli

Summary1.The tonotopically organized auditory neostriatum (Field L1,L2,L3) was examined in 7 animals for single units which respond to Iambus-like calls and other calls (responsive units), or which clearly distinguish Iambus-like calls of the guinea fowl from other calls of the species (selective units). A high proportion of responsive (168 units: 46%) and of selective units (58 units: 16%) was localized in an area with best frequencies of units between 1 and 2 kHz. Only selective units are described in this paper.2.Stimulation with 16 natural variations of the Iambus call showed that the 58 selective units formed a population of comparable neurons, in that 80% responded to more than 9 Iambus variations. High response coincidences of neurons to particular Iambus variations indicated that the neuronal preference relied on characteristic lines in the Iambus spectrum and not on accidental properties (Figs. 1–6).3.In most Iambi the energy is concentrated in spectral lines between 1 and 2.3 kHz. This band is called the doininant spectral band. The highest response score for Iambus variations contained those units which responded to tones of 1.8 and 1 kHz within the dominant band (Figs. 8, 11). One kHz is the fundamental frequency of the harmonic Iambus spectrum, and 1.8 kHz comes close to the formant, i.e. the energy maximum of an average Iambus spectrum. Selective units rarely responded to 1.5 kHz, and Iambus variations with a strong 1.5 kHz component least frequently elicited responses from units (Figs. 8, 11).4.Half of the selective units showed multiple response maxima when stimulated with tone bursts. One or several maxima were between 1 and 2 kHz. Most other units showed suppression of activity between 1 and 2 kHz or no tone responses (Figs. 9–11). The absence of a tone response was no indication of a higher call selectivity of units.5.Pulse trains of different periodicity (P) generate harmonic spectra with varying fundamental frequencies (Figs. 13, 14). These stimuli frequently yielded neuronal response maxima at 1 kHz fundamental frequency (the fundamental of Iambus-like calls) as well as maxima at 1.8 kHz and below 700 Hz. Such maxima were also observed in units with no pure tone response or with no tone response in this band (Figs. 9–11).6.Pulse trains which are amplitude modulated (PAM) generate harmonic spectra with sidebands (Fig. 12). A majority of selective units gave prominent responses to PAM with a combination of 900 Hz to 1.2 kHz fundamental frequency and sidebands of 50 Hz to several hundred Hz distance from the harmonics (Figs. 9, 10). This corresponds to the characteristic spectral lines of Iambus calls (Figs. 13, 14).7.In other units the spectral envelope of PAM stimuli had to be adjusted to the formant of Iambi by bandpass filtering the signal in order to obtain prominent responses (Fig. 11). These stimuli (Figs. 13, 14) mimic focal properties, i.e. the complete spectral construction of Iambi.8.One of the most important findings appears to be that selective units were far more specialized to distinguish Iambi from other wide-band calls with spectral overlap in the dominant spectral band than they were to distinguish Iambi from their simple or complex spectral components.

[1]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Acoustic Determinants of Vowel Color; Observations on One- and Two-Formant Vowels Synthesized from Spectrographic Patterns , 1952 .

[3]  L. S. Frishkopf,et al.  Neural coding in the bullfrog's auditory system a teleological approach , 1968 .

[4]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[5]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Single-unit activity in the primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. Biederman-Thorson Auditory responses of neurones in the lateral mesencephalic nucleus (inferior colliculus) of the Barbary dove , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  N Suga,et al.  Amplitude spectrum representation in the Doppler-shifted-CF processing area of the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. , 1977, Science.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  H. Funkenstein,et al.  Responses to acoustic stimuli of units in the auditory cortex of awake squirrel monkeys , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  M. Konishi,et al.  Tonotopic organization in the avian telencephalon , 1976, Brain Research.

[12]  N Suga,et al.  Aural representation in the Doppler-shifted-CF processing area of the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. , 1978, Science.

[13]  D. Klatt,et al.  How does a mynah bird imitate human speech? , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A R Moller Unit responses in the rat cochlear nucleus to tones of rapidly varying frequency and amplitude. , 1971, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  T. Imig,et al.  Organization of auditory cortex in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus) , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  J. Newman,et al.  Multiple coding of species-specific vocalizations in the auditory cortex of squirrel monkeys. , 1973, Brain research.

[17]  F G Worden,et al.  Auditory processing of biologically significant sounds. , 1972, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[18]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: discrimination of sustained /a/ and /i/. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C. H. Greenewalt Bird song: acoustics and physiology , 1968 .

[20]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  P. Knight,et al.  Representation of the cochlea within the anterior auditory field (AAF) of the cat , 1977, Brain Research.

[22]  F. C. Hellweg,et al.  Representation of the cochlea in the neocortex of guinea pigs , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  N Suga,et al.  Disproportionate tonotopic representation for processing CF-FM sonar signals in the mustache bat auditory cortex. , 1976, Science.

[24]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  FEATURE EXTRACTION IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEM OF BATS , 1973 .

[25]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  H. Karten,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the pigeon (Columba livia) , 1967 .

[27]  I. Whitfield,et al.  Unit responses from brain‐stem nuclei in the pigeon , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Shinjiro Oonishi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION AND INTEGRATIVE MECHANISM ON THE AUDITORY CORTEX OF THE CAT , 1965 .

[29]  M. Zaretsky A new auditory area of the songbird forebrain: A connection between auditory and song control centers , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  M. Biederman-Thorson Auditory responses of units in the ovoid nucleus and cerebrum (field L) of the ring dove. , 1970, Brain research.

[31]  Moshe Abeles,et al.  Single Unit Activity of the Auditory Cortex , 1975 .

[32]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Toward the Specification of Speech , 1950 .

[33]  I. A. Vartanian,et al.  TIME DEPENDENT FEATURES OF ADEQUATE SOUND STIMULI AND THE FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF CENTRAL AUDITORY NEURONS , 1973 .

[34]  H. Funkenstein,et al.  The effect of species-specific vocalization on the discharge of auditory cortical cells in the awake squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  H. Scheich,et al.  Coding of narrow-band and wide-band vocalizations in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[36]  H. Karten,et al.  The ascending auditory pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia). II. Telencephalic projections of the nucleus ovoidalis thalami. , 1968, Brain research.

[37]  C. K. Burdick,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: discrimination of sustained /a/ and /i/. , 1975 .

[38]  M. Konishi Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds , 1970, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[39]  M. Abeles,et al.  Functional architecture in cat primary auditory cortex: columnar organization and organization according to depth. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Hans -Joachim Leppelsack Funktionelle Eigenschaften der Hörbahn im Feld L des Neostriatum caudale des Staren (Sturnus vulgaris L., Aves) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[41]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Auditory sensitivity of the diencephalon of the leopard frogRana p. pipiens , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[42]  J D Miller,et al.  Auditory sensitivity and song spectrum of the common canary (Serinus canarius). , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  J. L. Hall,et al.  Erratum: Single‐Unit Activity in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Unanesthetized Cats [J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 43, 444–455 (1968)] , 1968 .

[44]  H. Leppelsack,et al.  Responses of auditory neurons in the forebrain of a songbird to stimulation with species-specific sounds , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[45]  Thomas A. Sebeok,et al.  How Animals Communicate , 1979 .

[46]  M Abeles,et al.  Responses of single units in the primary auditory cortex of the cat to tones and to tone pairs. , 1972, Brain research.

[47]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[48]  H. Scheich,et al.  Connectivity of the auditory forebrain nuclei in the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 1979, Cell and Tissue Research.