Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment. Report of an Independent Advisory Committee on Applied Climate Assessment

As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal “climate assessment consortium” to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit–cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.

[1]  Cambridge University Press.  Cambridge University Press , 2021 .

[2]  R. Moss,et al.  To co-produce or not to co-produce , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[3]  Rachel James,et al.  Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change , 2018, Climatic Change.

[4]  Francesca Rossi,et al.  AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations , 2018, Minds and Machines.

[5]  Sara Meerow,et al.  Adaptation to Resilience Planning: Alternative Pathways to Prepare for Climate Change , 2018, Journal of Planning Education and Research.

[6]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Solomon Hsiang,et al.  Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States , 2017, Science.

[8]  Robert Arlinghaus,et al.  Participatory adaptive management leads to environmental learning outcomes extending beyond the sphere of science , 2017, Science Advances.

[9]  J. W. Schipper,et al.  Tailoring Climate Parameters to Information Needs for Local Adaptation to Climate Change , 2017 .

[10]  James C. Arnott,et al.  Evaluation that counts: A review of climate change adaptation indicators & metrics using lessons from effective evaluation and science-practice interaction , 2016 .

[11]  James L. Neumann,et al.  Enhancing the climate resilience of Africa’s Infrastructure: the roads and bridges sector , 2016 .

[12]  Anthony C. Janetos,et al.  Building an integrated U.S. National Climate Indicators System , 2016, Climatic Change.

[13]  Michael Ghil,et al.  An end-to-end assessment of extreme weather impacts on food security , 2015 .

[14]  George D. Haddow,et al.  Living with Climate Change: How Communities Are Surviving and Thriving in a Changing Climate , 2015 .

[15]  T. Wall,et al.  Moving Toward the Deliberate Co-Production of Climate Science Knowledge , 2015 .

[16]  Cynthia Rosenzweig,et al.  Preface to Building the Knowledge Base for Climate Resiliency: New York City Panel on Climate Change 2015 Report , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Martinich,et al.  Joint effects of storm surge and sea-level rise on US Coasts: new economic estimates of impacts, adaptation, and benefits of mitigation policy , 2014, Climatic Change.

[18]  V. Bekkers,et al.  A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey , 2014 .

[19]  Richard B. Rood,et al.  Moving Climate Information off the Shelf: Boundary Chains and the Role of RISAs as Adaptive Organizations , 2014 .

[20]  R. Bierbaum,et al.  A typology of adaptation actions: A global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the Global Environment Facility , 2014 .

[21]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  A Tale of Two “Forests”: Random Forest Machine Learning Aids Tropical Forest Carbon Mapping , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Linda O. Mearns,et al.  The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections , 2013 .

[23]  A. Kumar,et al.  Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science , 2013, Science.

[24]  E. Dunlea,et al.  A national strategy for advancing climate modeling , 2012 .

[25]  Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al.  Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .

[26]  Casey Brown,et al.  Investment Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty -- Application to Climate Change , 2012 .

[27]  Jeffrey D Sachs,et al.  Climate Change Adaptation in New York City: Building a Risk Management Response , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail , 2008 .

[29]  D. Cayan,et al.  California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment , 2018 .

[30]  M. Stults,et al.  Integrating climate change into hazard mitigation planning: Opportunities and examples in practice , 2017 .

[31]  Solomon Hsiang,et al.  Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States , 2017, Science.

[32]  S. Klempin.  Establishing the Backbone: An Underexplored Facet of Collective Impact Efforts , 2016 .

[33]  E. Cloyd,et al.  Ch. 26: Decision Support: Connecting Science, Risk Perception, and Decisions. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment , 2014 .

[34]  Arthur Lee,et al.  Ch. 28: Adaptation. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment , 2014 .

[35]  P. Kirshen,et al.  Ch. 25: Coastal Zone Development and Ecosystems. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment , 2014 .

[36]  L. Mearns,et al.  The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections , 2013 .

[37]  Alistair Hunt,et al.  Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature , 2011 .

[38]  Cynthia Rosenzweig,et al.  Climate change adaptation in New York City: building a risk management response. The New York City Panel on Climate Change 2010 Report. , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.