Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities

Previous studies have shown that the number of objects we can actively hold in visual working memory is smaller for more complex objects. However, complex objects are not just more complex but are often more similar to other complex objects used as test probes. To separate effects of complexity from effects of similarity, we measured visual memory following a 1-sec delay for complex and simple objects at several levels of memory-to-test similarity. When memory load was one object, memory accuracy for a face (a complex attribute) was similar to a line orientation (a simple attribute) when the face changed in steps of 10% along a morphing continuum and the line changed in steps of 5° in orientation. Performance declined with increasing memory load and increasing memory-to-test similarity. Remarkably, when memory load was three or four objects, face memory was better than orientation memory at similar changed steps. These results held when memory for line orientations was compared with that for inverted faces. We conclude that complex objects do not always exhaust visual memory more quickly than simple objects do.

[1]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[3]  W. R. Garner.  Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[4]  J. Rouder,et al.  Absolute Identification with Simple and Complex Stimuli , 2001, Psychological science.

[5]  R. Logie.  Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1994 .

[6]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[10]  G. Moraglia,et al.  Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  Won Mok Shim,et al.  Interference from filled delays on visual change detection. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[13]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Short-Term Episodic Memory for Visual Textures , 2004, Psychological science.

[14]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Proactive interference from items previously stored in visual working memory , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  Fixed resolution, slot-like representations in visual working memory , 2004 .

[17]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[18]  I. Gauthier,et al.  A visual short-term memory advantage for faces , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[21]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli , 2005 .

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[23]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  F. Attneave.  Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  A configural effect in visual short-term memory for features from different parts of an object , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Heather Buttle,et al.  High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuli , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  J. Palmer.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[31]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[32]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Send Correspondence to , 2005 .

[33]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .

[35]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[38]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[39]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[41]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  D. Pelli,et al.  Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.

[43]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[44]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual short-term memory operates more efficiently on boundary features than on surface features , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Face Recognition Based on Fitting a 3D Morphable Model , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[46]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[47]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[48]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The effect of goodness onencoding time in visual pattern discrimination , 1974 .

[49]  Diyu Chen,et al.  Visual working memory for trained and novel polygons , 2006 .