Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements

Abstract Research has shown that humans have a preference for images of nature over images of built environments, and that eye-movement behaviour and attention are significantly different across these categories. To build on these findings, we investigated the influence of low-level visual properties on scene preference, cognitive load, and eye-movements. In the present study, participants viewed a mixture of unaltered and altered photographs of nature and urban scenes to determine if low-level visual properties influenced responses to scenes. Altered versions included photographs with only low or mid-to-high visual spatial frequency information, and photographs where the phase or amplitude of visual spatial frequencies had been scrambled. We replicated past findings, demonstrating preference and longer fixation-time for nature scenes versus urban cities. We then demonstrated that the visual spatial frequencies and power spectra contained in images significantly influenced preference, cognitive load, and eye-movements, and can partially explain the restoration response to natural environments.

[1]  Deltcho Valtchanov,et al.  Physiological and Affective Responses to Immersion in Virtual Reality: Effects of Nature and Urban Settings , 2010 .

[2]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  The effectiveness of technology-enhanced relaxation techniques for military medical warriors. , 2011, Military medicine.

[3]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[4]  Ethan A. McMahan,et al.  The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis , 2015 .

[5]  S. Kaplan.  Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue , 2001 .

[6]  Branka Spehar,et al.  Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Jackson Pollock's Fractals , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Edward A. Vessel,et al.  The neural basis of scene preferences , 2007, Neuroreport.

[8]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Does Interactive Media Enhance the Management of Stress? Suggestions from a Controlled Study , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Windows in the Workplace , 1998 .

[10]  Edward A. Vessel,et al.  Perceptual Pleasure and the Brain A novel theory explains why the brain craves information and seeks it through the senses , 2016 .

[11]  Frances E. Kuo,et al.  Children With Attention Deficits Concentrate Better After Walk in the Park , 2009, Journal of attention disorders.

[12]  Mark S. Hancock,et al.  EnviroPulse: Providing Feedback about the Expected Affective Valence of the Environment , 2015, CHI.

[13]  Katinka H. Evensen,et al.  Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting , 2011 .

[14]  J. Jonides,et al.  The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature , 2008, Psychological science.

[15]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  What's wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment , 2006 .

[16]  S. Massaccesi,et al.  Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis , 2008 .

[17]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[18]  J. Stern,et al.  The endogenous eyeblink. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Michael C. Hout,et al.  Is the preference of natural versus man-made scenes driven by bottom–up processing of the visual features of nature? , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[20]  James J. Gross,et al.  The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition , 2015 .

[21]  Grete Grindal Patil,et al.  Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants in Workplaces: Putting Experimental Results into Context , 2007 .

[22]  Seiji Shibata,et al.  Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[23]  A. Bentivoglio,et al.  Analysis of blink rate patterns in normal subjects , 1997, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[24]  K. Befort,et al.  Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[25]  Vera Ferrari,et al.  The influence of color on emotional perception of natural scenes. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  E. Gullone,et al.  The Biophilia Hypothesis and Life in the 21st Century: Increasing Mental Health or Increasing Pathology? , 2000 .

[28]  Rita Berto,et al.  An exploratory study of the effect of high and low fascination environments on attentional fatigue , 2010 .

[29]  G. Diette,et al.  A randomized trial of nature scenery and sounds versus urban scenery and sounds to reduce pain in adults undergoing bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. , 2010, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[30]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Processing of one, two or four natural scenes in humans: the limits of parallelism , 2004, Vision Research.

[31]  G. Evans,et al.  Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences , 1991 .

[32]  Deltcho Valtchanov,et al.  Restorative Effects of Virtual Nature Settings , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[34]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A bimodal tuning curve for spatial frequency across left and right human orbital frontal cortex during object recognition. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  L. Tassinary,et al.  Anger and Stress , 2008 .

[36]  S. Koole,et al.  Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? , 2003 .

[37]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Relations between the statistical regularities of natural images and the response properties of the early visual system , 2005 .

[38]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  From regular text to artistic writing and artworks: Fourier statistics of images with low and high aesthetic appeal , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Spatial Frequency Tuning Reveals Interactions between the Dorsal and Ventral Visual Systems , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  W. Geisler.  Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  Camiel J. Beukeboom,et al.  Stress-reducing effects of real and artificial nature in a hospital waiting room. , 2012, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[42]  T. Gärling,et al.  A measure of restorative quality in environments , 1997 .

[43]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework , 1995 .

[44]  D. Garcia,et al.  Spontaneous eyeblink activity. , 2011, The ocular surface.

[45]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences , 2014 .

[46]  R. Ulrich.  Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment , 1983 .

[47]  R. Berto.  Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity , 2005 .

[48]  D. Field,et al.  Natural image statistics and efficient coding. , 1996, Network.

[49]  Grete Grindal Patil,et al.  Biophilia: Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being? , 2009, International journal of environmental research and public health.