Volition-adaptive control for gait training using wearable exoskeleton: preliminary tests with incomplete spinal cord injury individuals

BackgroundGait training for individuals with neurological disorders is challenging in providing the suitable assistance and more adaptive behaviour towards user needs. The user specific adaptation can be defined based on the user interaction with the orthosis and by monitoring the user intentions. In this paper, an adaptive control model, commanded by the user intention, is evaluated using a lower limb exoskeleton with incomplete spinal cord injury individuals (SCI).MethodsA user intention based adaptive control model has been developed and evaluated with 4 incomplete SCI individuals across 3 sessions of training per individual. The adaptive control model modifies the joint impedance properties of the exoskeleton as a function of the human-orthosis interaction torques and the joint trajectory evolution along the gait sequence, in real time. The volitional input of the user is identified by monitoring the neural signals, pertaining to the user’s motor activity. These volitional inputs are used as a trigger to initiate the gait movement, allowing the user to control the initialization of the exoskeleton movement, independently. A Finite-state machine based control model is used in this set-up which helps in combining the volitional orders with the gait adaptation.ResultsThe exoskeleton demonstrated an adaptive assistance depending on the patients’ performance without guiding them to follow an imposed trajectory. The exoskeleton initiated the trajectory based on the user intention command received from the brain machine interface, demonstrating it as a reliable trigger. The exoskeleton maintained the equilibrium by providing suitable assistance throughout the experiments. A progressive change in the maximum flexion of the knee joint was observed at the end of each session which shows improvement in the patient performance. Results of the adaptive impedance were evaluated by comparing with the application of a constant impedance value. Participants reported that the movement of the exoskeleton was flexible and the walking patterns were similar to their own distinct patterns.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that user specific adaptive control can be applied on a wearable robot based on the human-orthosis interaction torques and modifying the joints’ impedance properties. The patients perceived no external or impulsive force and felt comfortable with the assistance provided by the exoskeleton. The main goal of such a user dependent control is to assist the patients’ needs and adapt to their characteristics, thus maximizing their engagement in the therapy and avoiding slacking. In addition, the initiation directly controlled by the brain allows synchronizing the user’s intention with the afferent stimulus provided by the movement of the exoskeleton, which maximizes the potentiality of the system in neuro-rehabilitative therapies.

[1]  Wilian M. dos Santos,et al.  Adaptive impedance control for robot-aided rehabilitation of ankle movements , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[2]  Khairul Anam,et al.  Active Exoskeleton Control Systems: State of the Art , 2012 .

[3]  Luis Montesano,et al.  A Pilot Study of Brain-Triggered Electrical Stimulation with Visual Feedback in Patients with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2018 .

[4]  Edwin van Asseldonk,et al.  Actively controlled lateral gait assistance in a lower limb exoskeleton , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Alicia Casals,et al.  Recovering Planned Trajectories in Robotic Rehabilitation Therapies under the Effect of Disturbances , 2014, Int. J. Syst. Dyn. Appl..

[6]  V. Dietz,et al.  Biofeedback in gait training with the robotic orthosis Lokomat , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Ana Esclarín-Ruz,et al.  A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Lihua Huang,et al.  On the Control of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  賢二 鈴木 慢性副鼻腔炎に対するrandomized controlled study , 2002 .

[11]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  Neurorobotic and hybrid management of lower limb motor disorders: a review , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[12]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  XPED2: A Passive Exoskeleton with Artificial Tendons , 2014, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[13]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons , 2008 .

[14]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  Automated detection of gait initiation and termination using wearable sensors. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Jason Farquhar,et al.  Decoding Sensorimotor Rhythms during Robotic-Assisted Treadmill Walking for Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Applications , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Bram Koopman,et al.  The effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: an explorative study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  T. Hoellinger,et al.  MINDWALKER: Going one step further with assistive lower limbs exoskeleton for SCI condition subjects , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[19]  Luis Montesano,et al.  Evolution of EEG Motor Rhythms after Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Study , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Peng Qi,et al.  Gait-Event-Based Synchronization Method for Gait Rehabilitation Robots via a Bioinspired Adaptive Oscillator , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  Shahid Hussain,et al.  Control of a robotic orthosis for gait rehabilitation , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[23]  Mukul Talaty,et al.  Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: An analysis of walking kinematics , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[24]  J. L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Restoration of Whole Body Movement: Toward a Noninvasive Brain-Machine Interface System , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[25]  Muhammad Abd-El-Barr,et al.  Long-term Training With a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[26]  Tanvir Anwar,et al.  Patient cooperative adaptive controller for lower limb Robotic Rehabilitation Device , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC).

[27]  J. Moreno,et al.  The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  An adaptive control strategy for postural stability using a wearable robot , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  R Jiménez-Fabián,et al.  Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Preliminary Assessment of Legged Mobility Provided by a Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Persons With Paraplegia , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[32]  Jorg Kruger,et al.  Patient adaptive control of end-effector based gait rehabilitation devices using a haptic control framework , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[33]  Tingfang Yan,et al.  Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[34]  Tadej Bajd,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics. , 2011, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[35]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  E. Field-Fote,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Gait Quality Is Improved by Locomotor Training in Individuals with Sci Regardless of Training Approach , 2022 .

[37]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Introduction to Adaptive Control , 2011 .

[38]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Voluntary motion support control of Robot Suit HAL triggered by bioelectrical signal for hemiplegia , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[39]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[40]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Brain-machine interface facilitated neurorehabilitation via spinal stimulation after spinal cord injury: Recent progress and future perspectives , 2016, Brain Research.

[41]  Jun Morimoto,et al.  Brain-controlled exoskeleton robot for BMI rehabilitation , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012).

[42]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  The development and testing of a human machine interface for a mobile medical exoskeleton , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[43]  Antoinette Domingo,et al.  Reliability and validity of using the Lokomat to assess lower limb joint position sense in people with incomplete spinal cord injury , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[44]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Compensatory strategies during normal walking in response to muscle weakness and increased hip joint stiffness. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[45]  Joan Aranda,et al.  Event-based control for sit-to-stand transition using a wearable exoskeleton , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[46]  Alicia Casals,et al.  User Intention Driven Adaptive Gait Assistance Using a Wearable Exoskeleton , 2015, ROBOT.

[47]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[48]  An H. Do,et al.  The feasibility of a brain-computer interface functional electrical stimulation system for the restoration of overground walking after paraplegia , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[49]  Zoran Nenadic,et al.  Brain-computer interface controlled robotic gait orthosis , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[50]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Development of an assist controller with robot suit HAL for hemiplegic patients using motion data on the unaffected side , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[51]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[52]  Yacine Amirat,et al.  Powered orthosis for lower limb movements assistance and rehabilitation , 2014 .

[53]  Luis Montesano,et al.  Control of an Ambulatory Exoskeleton with a Brain–Machine Interface for Spinal Cord Injury Gait Rehabilitation , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[54]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Powered Lower Limb Orthosis to Aid Walking in Paraplegic Individuals , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[55]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  Hybrid therapy of walking with Kinesis overground robot for persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: A feasibility study , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[56]  Ángel Gil-Agudo,et al.  Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[57]  Kyoungchul Kong,et al.  A motion phase-based hybrid assistive controller for lower limb exoskeletons , 2014, 2014 IEEE 13th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC).

[58]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Motor patterns during walking on a slippery walkway. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  LOPES II—Design and Evaluation of an Admittance Controlled Gait Training Robot With Shadow-Leg Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[60]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[61]  Luis Montesano,et al.  Brain-machine interfaces for motor rehabilitation: Is recalibration important? , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[62]  Alicia Casals,et al.  Compliant gait assistance triggered by user intention , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[63]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Robot assisted treadmill training: mechanisms and training strategies. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[64]  C. Werner,et al.  Robot assisted therapy in neurorehabilitation , 2008 .

[65]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[66]  Young Kim,et al.  The effects of EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation on upper extremity function in stroke patients , 2013 .

[67]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  An Assistive Control Approach for a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton to Facilitate Recovery of Walking Following Stroke , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[68]  Mohd Yamani Idna Idris,et al.  Using finite state machine and a hybrid of EEG signal and EOG artifacts for an asynchronous wheelchair navigation , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[69]  M. Molinari,et al.  Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[70]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Movement Anticipation and EEG: Implications for BCI-Contingent Robot Therapy , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[71]  Á. Gil-Agudo,et al.  Continuous decoding of movement intention of upper limb self-initiated analytic movements from pre-movement EEG correlates , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[72]  Alicia Casals,et al.  Adaptive walking assistance based on human-orthosis interaction , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[73]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.