Towards Using UAVs in Wilderness Search and Rescue: Lessons from Field Trials

Wilderness Search and Rescue (WiSAR) is the process of finding and assisting persons who are lost in remote wilderness areas. Because such areas are often rugged or relatively inaccessible, searching for missing persons can take huge amounts of time and resources. Camera-equipped mini-Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have the potential for speeding up the search process by enabling searchers to view aerial video of an area of interest while closely coordinating with nearby ground searchers. In this paper, we report on lessons learned by trying to use UAVs to support WiSAR. Our research methodology has relied heavily on field trials involving searches conducted under the direction of practicing search and rescue personnel but using simulated missing persons. Lessons from these field trials include the immediate importance of seeing things well in the video, the field need for defining and supporting various roles in the search team, role-specific needs like supporting systematic search by providing a visualization tool to represent the quality of the search, and the on-going need to better support interactions between ground and video searchers. Surprisingly to us, sophisticated autonomous search patterns were less critical than we anticipated, though advances in video enhancement and visualizing search progress, as well as ongoing work to model the likely location of a missing person, open up the possibility of closing the loop between UAV path-planning, search quality, and the likely location of a moving missing person. To appear Interaction Studies 10(3) 2009

[1]  James F. Blinn,et al.  Where am I? What am I looking at? (cinematography) , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[3]  Tyler T Prevett,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays , 1995 .

[4]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Aviation Display Support for Situation Awareness , 1997 .

[5]  E. H. Cornell,et al.  Characteristics of Travel by Persons Lost in Albertan Wilderness Areas , 1998 .

[6]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[7]  K.S. Tso,et al.  A multi-agent operator interface for unmanned aerial vehicles , 1999, Gateway to the New Millennium. 18th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH37033).

[8]  Michael B. Cowen,et al.  Use of Perspective View Displays for Operational Tasks , 1999 .

[9]  E. Spelke,et al.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation , 2000, Cognition.

[10]  Richard P. Wildes,et al.  Video georegistration: algorithm and quantitative evaluation , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[11]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[12]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Coordinated decentralized search for a lost target in a Bayesian world , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[13]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Semi-autonomous human-UAV interfaces for fixed-wing mini-UAVs , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Perspective and Coplanar Cockpit Displays of Traffic Information: Implications for Maneuver Choice, Flight Safety, and Mental Workload , 2005 .

[15]  Tomonari Furukawa,et al.  Multi-vehicle Bayesian Search for Multiple Lost Targets , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Timothy W. McLain,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technologies for Small Fixed-Wing UAVs , 2005, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[17]  T.W. McLain,et al.  Vector field path following for small unmanned air vehicles , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[18]  Nancy J. Cooke Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles , 2006 .

[19]  M.A. Goodrich,et al.  Using a Mini-UAV to Support Wilderness Search and Rescue: Practices for Human-Robot Teaming , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics.

[20]  Alexei Makarenko,et al.  Shared environment representation for a human‐robot team performing information fusion , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[21]  Barry A. Bodt,et al.  A field experiment of autonomous mobility: Operator workload for one and two robots , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Application and evaluation of spatiotemporal enhancement of live aerial video using temporally local mosaics , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Towards combining UAV and sensor operator roles in UAV-enabled visual search , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[24]  Mike Hall,et al.  Cooperative use of unmanned sea surface and micro aerial vehicles at Hurricane Wilma , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[25]  Cameron Howard Engh A See-ability Metric to Improve Mini Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operator Awareness Using Video Georegistered to Terrain Models , 2008 .

[26]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Supporting wilderness search and rescue using a camera‐equipped mini UAV , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[27]  David G. Schmale,et al.  Development and application of an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle for precise aerobiological sampling above agricultural fields , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[28]  Howie Choset,et al.  Editorial: Search and rescue robots , 2008 .

[29]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .