Review of Power Quality Disturbances Classification Using Variable Size Detector (V-Detector)

The variable size detector (V-detector) is a real-valued negative selection algorithm with variable-sized detector. The V-detector algorithm is a kind of negative selection algorithm (NSA) inspired by biological immune system (BIS).This paper overviewed the theory of basis V-detector algorithm and typical improved V-detector algorithm summarized their applications in the area of power quality disturbances classification. The comparison between the traditional and V-detector method shows the method has good applicability and effectiveness for power quality disturbances classification. The analysis directions of a new dimension of studying about the power quality (PQ) disturbance classification are also forwarded. All of these showed that the Vdetector based methods have great potential for the future development in the power quality or others field of studies.

[1]  M. M. Morcos,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Mathematical Tools for Power Quality Applications: A Survey , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  M. Ilic,et al.  ANNs based on subtractive cluster feature for classifying power quality , 2008, 2008 40th North American Power Symposium.

[3]  A. Pahwa,et al.  A new method for power quality disturbance classification based on the proliferating V-detectors algorithm , 2008, 2008 40th North American Power Symposium.

[4]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004 , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Real-Valued Negative Selection Algorithm with Variable-Sized Detectors , 2004, GECCO.

[6]  Muhsin Tunay Gençoglu,et al.  An expert system based on S-transform and neural network for automatic classification of power quality disturbances , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Applicability issues of the real-valued negative selection algorithms , 2006, GECCO '06.

[8]  Jie Zeng,et al.  Significant Level in V-detector Generation Algorithm , 2009, 2009 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Processing.

[9]  Simon M. Garrett,et al.  How Do We Evaluate Artificial Immune Systems? , 2005, Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  Stephanie Forrest,et al.  Infect Recognize Destroy , 1996 .

[11]  Jonathan Timmis,et al.  Artificial immune systems as a novel soft computing paradigm , 2003, Soft Comput..

[12]  P. Govender,et al.  Fault diagnosis based on the artificial immune algorithm and negative selection , 2010, 2010 IEEE 17Th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[13]  Tao Li,et al.  An improved V-detector algorithm of identifying boundary self , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[14]  Jonathan Timmis,et al.  Application areas of AIS: The past, the present and the future , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Stephanie Forrest,et al.  Architecture for an Artificial Immune System , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  N. Ertugrul,et al.  Investigation of Effective Automatic Recognition Systems of Power-Quality Events , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  Haifeng Ma,et al.  Fault Detection Based on Real-Value Negative Selection Algorithm of Artificial Immune System , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Cognitive Informatics.

[18]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Self-nonself discrimination in a computer , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy.

[19]  Fabio A. González,et al.  A Randomized Real-Valued Negative Selection Algorithm , 2003, ICARIS.

[20]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  Rule based system for power quality disturbance classification incorporating S-transform features , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Estimating the detector coverage in a negative selection algorithm , 2005, GECCO '05.