Binding of Protein Kinase Inhibitors to Synapsin I Inferred from Pair-Wise Binding Site Similarity Measurements

Predicting off-targets by computational methods is getting increasing importance in early drug discovery stages. We herewith present a computational method based on binding site three-dimensional comparisons, which prompted us to investigate the cross-reaction of protein kinase inhibitors with synapsin I, an ATP-binding protein regulating neurotransmitter release in the synapse. Systematic pair-wise comparison of the staurosporine-binding site of the proto-oncogene Pim-1 kinase with 6,412 druggable protein-ligand binding sites suggested that the ATP-binding site of synapsin I may recognize the pan-kinase inhibitor staurosporine. Biochemical validation of this hypothesis was realized by competition experiments of staurosporine with ATP-γ35S for binding to synapsin I. Staurosporine, as well as three other inhibitors of protein kinases (cdk2, Pim-1 and casein kinase type 2), effectively bound to synapsin I with nanomolar affinities and promoted synapsin-induced F-actin bundling. The selective Pim-1 kinase inhibitor quercetagetin was shown to be the most potent synapsin I binder (IC50  = 0.15 µM), in agreement with the predicted binding site similarities between synapsin I and various protein kinases. Other protein kinase inhibitors (protein kinase A and chk1 inhibitor), kinase inhibitors (diacylglycerolkinase inhibitor) and various other ATP-competitors (DNA topoisomerase II and HSP-90α inhibitors) did not bind to synapsin I, as predicted from a lower similarity of their respective ATP-binding sites to that of synapsin I. The present data suggest that the observed downregulation of neurotransmitter release by some but not all protein kinase inhibitors may also be contributed by a direct binding to synapsin I and phosphorylation-independent perturbation of synapsin I function. More generally, the data also demonstrate that cross-reactivity with various targets may be detected by systematic pair-wise similarity measurement of ligand-annotated binding sites.

[1]  Nathanael Weill,et al.  Alignment-Free Ultra-High-Throughput Comparison of Druggable Protein-Ligand Binding Sites , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  L. Johnson Protein kinase inhibitors: contributions from structure to clinical compounds , 2009, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[3]  Izhar Wallach,et al.  Prediction of sub-cavity binding preferences using an adaptive physicochemical structure representation , 2009, Bioinform..

[4]  L. Meijer,et al.  Crystal Structure of Pyridoxal Kinase in Complex with Roscovitine and Derivatives* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  T. Südhof,et al.  Homo- and Heterodimerization of Synapsins* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  F. Matsumura,et al.  Synapsin I Is Phosphorylated at Ser603 by p21-activated Kinases (PAKs) in Vitro and in PC12 Cells Stimulated with Bradykinin* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  P. De Camilli,et al.  Synapsins: mosaics of shared and individual domains in a family of synaptic vesicle phosphoproteins. , 1989, Science.

[8]  Y.Z. Chen,et al.  Ligand–protein inverse docking and its potential use in the computer search of protein targets of a small molecule , 2001, Proteins.

[9]  Didier Rognan,et al.  How to Measure the Similarity Between Protein Ligand-Binding Sites? , 2008 .

[10]  C. Wermuth,et al.  Similarity in drugs: reflections on analogue design. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[11]  Meir Glick,et al.  Prediction of Biological Targets for Compounds Using Multiple-Category Bayesian Models Trained on Chemogenomics Databases , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[12]  J. Pin,et al.  Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  F. Benfenati,et al.  Synapsin Phosphorylation by Src Tyrosine Kinase Enhances Src Activity in Synaptic Vesicles* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  S. Hilfiker,et al.  Vesicle pools and synapsins: New insights into old enigmas , 2007, Brain cell biology.

[15]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Recognition of Functional Sites in Protein Structures☆ , 2004, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[16]  L. Meijer,et al.  Intracellular Targets of Paullones , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  A Multidimensional Strategy to Detect Polypharmacological Targets in the Absence of Structural and Sequence Homology , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  David A. Lee,et al.  PSI-2: structural genomics to cover protein domain family space. , 2009, Structure.

[19]  Philippe Bernard,et al.  Reverse pharmacognosy: application of selnergy, a new tool for lead discovery. The example of epsilon-viniferin. , 2005, Current drug discovery technologies.

[20]  L. Meijer,et al.  Inverse in silico screening for identification of kinase inhibitor targets. , 2007, Chemistry & biology.

[21]  T. Hunter,et al.  The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[22]  Yanli Wang,et al.  PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  P. Greengard,et al.  Characterization of synapsin I fragments produced by cysteine-specific cleavage: a study of their interactions with F-actin , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  P. Greengard,et al.  A protein kinase A–dependent molecular switch in synapsins regulates neurite outgrowth , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Greengard,et al.  Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Isozymic forms from rat forebrain and cerebellum. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  S. Ekins,et al.  In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling , 2007, British journal of pharmacology.

[27]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  L. Wodicka,et al.  A small molecule–kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Q. Do,et al.  Reverse Pharmacognosy: Application of Selnergy, a New Tool for Lead Discovery. The Example of ε-Viniferin , 2005 .

[30]  E. Kellenberger,et al.  A simple and fuzzy method to align and compare druggable ligand‐binding sites , 2008, Proteins.

[31]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  Tetramerization and ATP Binding by a Protein Comprising the A, B, and C Domains of Rat Synapsin I* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  R DeSalle,et al.  Molecular evolution of the synapsin gene family. , 1999, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[33]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Ranking Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Three-Dimensional Protein Libraries: Methods and Problems , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[34]  M. Murcko,et al.  Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[35]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Structure‐Based Approaches to Target Fishing and Ligand Profiling , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[36]  P. Greengard,et al.  Synapsin I bundles F-actin in a phosphorylation-dependent manner , 1987, Nature.

[37]  Adam Nelson,et al.  Synthesis of Natural-Product-Like Molecules with Over Eighty Distinct Scaffolds** , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[38]  J. Bajorath,et al.  SAR index: quantifying the nature of structure-activity relationships. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  J. Bajorath Computational analysis of ligand relationships within target families. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[41]  P. Greengard,et al.  Synapsin dispersion and reclustering during synaptic activity , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[43]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Global mapping of pharmacological space , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  P. Greengard,et al.  Effects of the neuronal phosphoprotein synapsin I on actin polymerization. I. Evidence for a phosphorylation-dependent nucleating effect. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[46]  P. Greengard,et al.  Opposing Changes in Phosphorylation of Specific Sites in Synapsin I During Ca2+-Dependent Glutamate Release in Isolated Nerve Terminals , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Didier Rognan,et al.  sc-PDB: an Annotated Database of Druggable Binding Sites from the Protein Data Bank , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[48]  Burkhard Rost,et al.  Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage , 2009, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[49]  N. Gold,et al.  Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  C. Laggner,et al.  Why drugs fail--a study on side effects in new chemical entities. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.

[51]  P. Greengard,et al.  Interaction of free and synaptic vesicle-bound synapsin I with F-actin , 1992, Neuron.

[52]  Didier Rognan,et al.  In silico-guided target identification of a scaffold-focused library: 1,3,5-triazepan-2,6-diones as novel phospholipase A2 inhibitors. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[53]  Y. Martin,et al.  Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Towards the optimal screening collection: a synthesis strategy. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[55]  Lin Tang,et al.  Roscovitine Targets, Protein Kinases and Pyridoxal Kinase*[boxs] , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.

[57]  Lin He,et al.  Harvesting Candidate Genes Responsible for Serious Adverse Drug Reactions from a Chemical-Protein Interactome , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  P. Greengard,et al.  Neurotrophins stimulate phosphorylation of synapsin I by MAP kinase and regulate synapsin I-actin interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  F. Benfenati,et al.  Phosphorylation of Synapsin I by cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Controls Synaptic Vesicle Dynamics in Developing Neurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  György Kéri,et al.  Cellular targets of gefitinib. , 2005, Cancer research.

[61]  D. Rognan Chemogenomic approaches to rational drug design , 2007, British journal of pharmacology.

[62]  P. Greengard,et al.  Structural Domains Involved in the Regulation of Transmitter Release by Synapsins , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Lei Xie,et al.  Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile–profile alignments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[65]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Peptide deformylase is a potential target for anti‐Helicobacter pylori drugs: Reverse docking, enzymatic assay, and X‐ray crystallography validation , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[66]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Repositioning the Safe Medicine Comtan to Treat Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[67]  Jian Wang,et al.  In Silico Elucidation of the Molecular Mechanism Defining the Adverse Effect of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[68]  T. Südhof,et al.  Synapsins I and II Are ATP-binding Proteins with Differential Ca2+ Regulation* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[69]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  Synapsin I is structurally similar to ATP‐utilizing enzymes , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[70]  F Benfenati,et al.  Synaptic vesicle phosphoproteins and regulation of synaptic function. , 1993, Science.

[71]  T. Pollard,et al.  Identification of a factor in conventional muscle actin preparations which inhibits actin filament self-association. , 1980, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[72]  T. Südhof,et al.  Synapsin III, a Novel Synapsin with an Unusual Regulation by Ca2+ * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[73]  P. Greengard,et al.  The synapsins. , 1990, Annual review of cell biology.

[74]  G. Schneider,et al.  PocketPicker: analysis of ligand binding-sites with shape descriptors , 2007, Chemistry Central Journal.

[75]  S. Grant Therapeutic Protein Kinase Inhibitors , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[76]  T. Klabunde,et al.  GPCR Antitarget Modeling: Pharmacophore Models for Biogenic Amine Binding GPCRs to Avoid GPCR‐Mediated Side Effects , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[77]  N. Paul,et al.  Recovering the true targets of specific ligands by virtual screening of the protein data bank , 2004, Proteins.

[78]  S. Linder,et al.  Target specificity and off-target effects as determinants of cancer drug efficacy. , 2008, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[79]  J. Spudich,et al.  The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[80]  Kalidas Yeturu,et al.  PocketMatch: A new algorithm to compare binding sites in protein structures , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[81]  Z. Deng,et al.  Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[82]  Fabio Benfenati,et al.  Synaptic vesicle-associated Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is a binding protein for synapsin I , 1992, Nature.

[83]  F. Benfenati,et al.  Protein Kinase A-Mediated Synapsin I Phosphorylation Is a Central Modulator of Ca2+-Dependent Synaptic Activity , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[84]  Michel Schneider,et al.  The UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot knowledgebase and its Plant Proteome Annotation Program. , 2009, Journal of proteomics.

[85]  P. Greengard,et al.  Synaptic Vesicle Mobilization Is Regulated by Distinct Synapsin I Phosphorylation Pathways at Different Frequencies , 2003, Neuron.

[86]  Scott Boyer,et al.  Ligand-Based Approach to In Silico Pharmacology: Nuclear Receptor Profiling , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[87]  Pang-Ning Tan,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[88]  Xiaomin Luo,et al.  TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approach , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[89]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[90]  Steven A Carr,et al.  Identifying the proteins to which small-molecule probes and drugs bind in cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[91]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs , 2009, Nature.

[92]  F. Benfenati,et al.  Synapsin associates with cyclophilin B in an ATP‐ and cyclosporin A‐dependent manner , 2005, Journal of neurochemistry.

[93]  G. Schneider,et al.  Model structure of APOBEC3C reveals a binding pocket modulating ribonucleic acid interaction required for encapsidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  P. Greengard,et al.  Dephosphorylated synapsin I anchors synaptic vesicles to actin cytoskeleton: an analysis by videomicroscopy , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.