Deep-Learning Inversion of Seismic Data

We propose a new method to tackle the mapping challenge from time-series data to spatial image in the field of seismic exploration, i.e., reconstructing the velocity model directly from seismic data by deep neural networks (DNNs). The conventional way of addressing this ill-posed inversion problem is through iterative algorithms, which suffer from poor nonlinear mapping and strong nonuniqueness. Other attempts may either import human intervention errors or underuse seismic data. The challenge for DNNs mainly lies in the weak spatial correspondence, the uncertain reflection–reception relationship between seismic data and velocity model, as well as the time-varying property of seismic data. To tackle these challenges, we propose end-to-end seismic inversion networks (SeisInvNets) with novel components to make the best use of all seismic data. Specifically, we start with every seismic trace and enhance it with its neighborhood information, its observation setup, and the global context of its corresponding seismic profile. From the enhanced seismic traces, the spatially aligned feature maps can be learned and further concatenated to reconstruct a velocity model. In general, we let every seismic trace contribute to the reconstruction of the whole velocity model by finding spatial correspondence. The proposed SeisInvNet consistently produces improvements over the baselines and achieves promising performance on our synthesized and proposed SeisInv data set according to various evaluation metrics. The inversion results are more consistent with the target from the aspects of velocity values, subsurface structures, and geological interfaces. Moreover, the mechanism and the generalization of the proposed method are discussed and verified. Nevertheless, the generalization of deep-learning-based inversion methods on real data is still challenging and considering physics may be one potential solution.

[1]  B. Biondi,et al.  Simultaneous Inversion of Full Data Bandwidth by Tomographic Full Waveform Inversion , 2014 .

[2]  R. Plessix A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications , 2006 .

[3]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  Frequency Controllable Envelope Operator and Its Application in Multiscale Full-Waveform Inversion , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Loss Functions for Neural Networks for Image Processing , 2015, ArXiv.

[5]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[6]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Tariq Alkhalifah,et al.  Simultaneous inversion of the background velocity and the perturbation in full-waveform inversion , 2015 .

[8]  Irfan Akca,et al.  Applications of hybrid genetic algorithms in seismic tomography , 2011 .

[9]  Lianjie Huang,et al.  Acoustic- and elastic-waveform inversion using a modified total-variation regularization scheme , 2014 .

[10]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[11]  C. Shin,et al.  Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain , 2008 .

[12]  Michael Unser,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Heiga Zen,et al.  WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio , 2016, SSW.

[14]  Hiroshi Takenaka,et al.  Parallel 3-D pseudospectral simulation of seismic wave propagation , 1998 .

[15]  J. Tromp,et al.  Misfit functions for full waveform inversion based on instantaneous phase and envelope measurements , 2011 .

[16]  Pier Paolo Bruno,et al.  3D ultra-high resolution seismic imaging of shallow Solfatara crater in Campi Flegrei (Italy): New insights on deep hydrothermal fluid circulation processes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Youzuo Lin,et al.  Inversionet: Accurate and efficient seismic-waveform inversion with convolutional neural networks , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[18]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  LFNet: A Novel Bidirectional Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Light-Field Image Super-Resolution , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  C. Bunks,et al.  Multiscale seismic waveform inversion , 1995 .

[20]  Xinbo Gao,et al.  Dual-Transfer Face Sketch–Photo Synthesis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Robust Single Image Super-Resolution via Deep Networks With Sparse Prior , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  拓海 杉山,et al.  “Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks”の学習報告 , 2017 .

[23]  Zongben Xu,et al.  An Optimized Deep Network Representation of Multimutation Differential Evolution and its Application in Seismic Inversion , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Valentí Sallarès,et al.  Waveform-Preserving Processing Flow of Multichannel Seismic Reflection Data for Adjoint-State Full-Waveform Inversion of Ocean Thermohaline Structure , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Automated fault detection without seismic processing , 2017 .

[26]  S. M. Doherty,et al.  Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data , 2000 .

[27]  Lior Wolf,et al.  Unsupervised Cross-Domain Image Generation , 2016, ICLR.

[28]  R. Gerhard Pratt,et al.  Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies , 2004 .

[29]  Silvio Savarese,et al.  3D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstruction , 2016, ECCV.

[30]  S. Operto,et al.  On the role of density and attenuation in three-dimensional multiparameter viscoacoustic VTI frequency-domain FWI: an OBC case study from the North Sea , 2018 .

[31]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[32]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[33]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[34]  Ping Tan,et al.  DualGAN: Unsupervised Dual Learning for Image-to-Image Translation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[35]  Jan Kautz,et al.  High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANs , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[36]  T. Poggio,et al.  Predicting geological features in 3D seismic data , 2016 .

[37]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Is L2 a Good Loss Function for Neural Networks for Image Processing , 2015 .

[38]  Youzuo Lin,et al.  InversionNet: An Efficient and Accurate Data-Driven Full Waveform Inversion , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[39]  Ning Wang,et al.  Effect of surface-related Rayleigh and multiple waves on velocity reconstruction with time-domain elastic FWI , 2018 .

[40]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Show and tell: A neural image caption generator , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[41]  Henri Calandra,et al.  A review of the spectral, pseudo‐spectral, finite‐difference and finite‐element modelling techniques for geophysical imaging , 2011 .

[42]  Peng Jiang,et al.  DifNet: Semantic Segmentation by Diffusion Networks , 2018, NeurIPS.

[43]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Video-to-Video Synthesis , 2018, NeurIPS.

[44]  Ole Winther,et al.  Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric , 2015, ICML.

[45]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[46]  Zhe Gan,et al.  AttnGAN: Fine-Grained Text to Image Generation with Attentional Generative Adversarial Networks , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[47]  Youcef Bouzidi,et al.  Imaging high-resolution velocity and attenuation structures from walkaway vertical seismic profile data in a carbonate reservoir using visco-acoustic waveform inversion , 2018, GEOPHYSICS.

[48]  Hicks,et al.  Gauss–Newton and full Newton methods in frequency–space seismic waveform inversion , 1998 .

[49]  Hejun Zhu,et al.  Full-waveform inversion using seislet regularization , 2017 .

[50]  Qinya Liu,et al.  Tomography, Adjoint Methods, Time-Reversal, and Banana-Doughnut Kernels , 2004 .

[51]  Amir Adler,et al.  Deep-learning tomography , 2018 .

[52]  Edip Baysal,et al.  Forward modeling by a Fourier method , 1982 .

[53]  Dirk Klaeschen,et al.  Resolving the fine-scale velocity structure of continental hyperextension at the Deep Galicia Margin using full-waveform inversion , 2018 .

[54]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Velocity model building with a modified fully convolutional network , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[55]  R. Pratt Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain; Part 1, Theory and verification in a physical scale model , 1999 .

[56]  Qiang Guo,et al.  Prestack Seismic Inversion Based on Anisotropic Markov Random Field , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[57]  Hui Zhou,et al.  Robust source-independent elastic full-waveform inversion in the time domain , 2016 .

[58]  T. Nissen‐Meyer,et al.  Fast approximate simulation of seismic waves with deep learning , 2018, 1807.06873.