Analyzing the Agent-Based Model and its Implications

Agent-based models (ABMs) have been attracting the attention of researchers in the social sciences, becoming a prominent paradigm in the study of complex social systems. Although a great number of models have been proposed for studying a variety of social phenomena, no general agent design methodology is available. Moreover, it is difficult to validate the accuracy of these models. For this reason, we believe that some guidelines for ABMs design must be devised; therefore, this paper is a first attempt to analyze the levels of ABMs, identify and classify several aspects that should be considered when designing ABMs. Through our analysis, the following implications have been found: (1) there are two levels in designing ABMs: the individual level, related to the design of the agents' internal structure, and the collective level, which concerns the design of the agent society or macro-dynamics of the model; and (2) the mechanisms of these levels strongly affect the outcomes of the models.

[1]  Nicolaas J. Vriend,et al.  An Illustration of the Essential Difference between Individual and Social Learning, and its Consequences for Computational Analyses , 1998 .

[2]  A. Rubinstein.  Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[3]  Martin H. Levinson.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2004 .

[4]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[5]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Task Assignment in Multiagent Systems Based on Vickrey-Type Auctioning and Leveled Commitment Contracting , 2000, CIA.

[6]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[7]  R. Axelrod.  Reviews book & software , 2022 .

[8]  Toshizumi Ohta,et al.  On a Mathematical Comparison between Hierarchy and Network with a Classification of Coordination Structures , 2001, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[9]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  The virtual design team , 1998, CACM.

[10]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Task Decomposition, Dynamic Role Assignment, and Low-Bandwidth Communication for Real-Time Strategic Teamwork , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Simulating organizations: computational models of institutions and groups , 1998 .

[12]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[13]  R. Axelrod,et al.  The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration , 1998 .

[14]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  R. Axelrod,et al.  How to Cope with Noise in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma , 1995 .

[16]  Herbert Dawid,et al.  Adaptive Learning by Genetic Algorithms , 1996 .

[17]  Osamu Katai,et al.  The X-MAS SYSTEM: Toward Simulation Systems for Cross-model-validation in Multiagent-Based Simulations , 2003 .

[18]  Børge Obel,et al.  The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[19]  Brendan D. McKay,et al.  Collective Choice and Mutual Knowledge Structures , 1998, Adv. Complex Syst..

[20]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  A Survey of Evolution Strategies , 1991, ICGA.

[21]  YAN JIN,et al.  The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[22]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[23]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[25]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE IN VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS March 23 , 1998 , 1998 .

[26]  G. Roberts,et al.  Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment , 1998, Nature.

[27]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[28]  J. Duclos,et al.  Poverty-Reducing Tax Reforms with Heterogeneous Agents , 2003 .

[29]  Herbert Dawid,et al.  Adaptive Learning by Genetic Algorithms, Analytical Results and Applications to Economic Models, 2nd extended and revised edition , 1999 .

[30]  Scott Moss,et al.  Messy Systems - The Target for Multi Agent Based Simulation , 2000, MABS.

[31]  E. Muñoz-Martínez.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness, by Duncan J. Watts, (Princeton Studies in Complexity), Princeton University Press, 1999. $39.50 (hardcover), 262 pp. ISBN: 0-691-00541-9. (Book Reviews) , 2000 .

[32]  Robert L. Axtell,et al.  Effects of Interaction Topology and Activation Regime in Several Multi-Agent Systems , 2000, MABS.

[33]  A. Colman,et al.  The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration , 1998, Complex..

[34]  Abhinay Muthoo,et al.  A Non-Technical Introduction to Bargaining Theory , 2000 .

[35]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[36]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[37]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[38]  Norikazu Sugimoto,et al.  Cross-Element Validation in Multiagent-based Simulation: Switching Learning Mechanisms in Agents , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[39]  Takao Terano,et al.  Nongovernance rather than governance in a multiagent economic society , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[40]  Two Organizational Knowledge-Sharing Models and Their Simulation Studies , 2000 .

[41]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Dynamic Network Analysis , 2003 .

[42]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  The Emergence of Social Organization in the Prisoner's Dilemma: How Context-Preservation and Other Factors Promote Cooperation , 1999 .

[43]  Paul Erdös,et al.  On random graphs, I , 1959 .

[44]  Alexandra Poulovassilis,et al.  Optimising Seld Adaptive Networks by Evolving Rule-Based Agents , 1999, EvoWorkshops.