Accuracy Quantification and Improvement of Serial Micropositioning Robots for In-Plane Motions

High positioning accuracy with micropositioning robots (MPRs) is required to successfully perform many complex tasks, such as microassembly, manipulation, and characterization of biological tissues and minimally invasive inspection and surgery. Despite the widespread use of high-resolution micro- and nanopositioning robots, there is very little knowledge about the real positioning accuracy that can be obtained and what the main influential factors are. Indeed, very few notable methods are available to measure multi-degree-of-freedom motions with adapted range, resolution, and dynamic capabilities. The main objective of this paper is to quantify the positioning accuracy of serial MPRs and to identify the main influential factors (a typical XY Θ serial robot is chosen as a case study). To reach this goal, a measuring system that combines vision and pseudoperiodic patterns with an extremely large range-to-resolution ratio is introduced as a new way to quantify the positioning accuracy of MPRs for in-plane motions. Then, an open-loop control approach based on MPR calibration is chosen for several reasons: the use of different models to identify influential factors, the quantification of the positioning accuracy, and the necessity of the method when sensor integration is too complex. Experiments using five different calibration models were conducted to classify factors influencing the positioning accuracy of MPRs. The results show that positioning accuracy can be improved by more than 35 times from 96 μ with no imperfection compensation to 2.5 μ by compensating for geometric, position-dependent, and angle-dependent errors through the MPR calibration approach.

[1]  Bahram Ravani,et al.  An overview of robot calibration , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Jun Luo,et al.  Locating End-Effector Tips in Robotic Micromanipulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  Ryad Benosman,et al.  Asynchronous Event-Based Visual Shape Tracking for Stable Haptic Feedback in Microrobotics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  P Saketi,et al.  A flexible microrobotic platform for handling microscale specimens of fibrous materials for microscopic studies , 2012, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Study of Forces During Microassembly Tasks Using Two-Sensing-Fingers Grippers , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[6]  Stéphane Régnier,et al.  Microrobotics for Micromanipulation. , 2010 .

[7]  Ning Tan,et al.  Characterization and compensation of XY micropositioning robots using vision and pseudo-periodic encoded patterns , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[8]  Bo Song,et al.  Cellular level robotic surgery: Nanodissection of intermediate filaments in live keratinocytes. , 2015, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[9]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Rapidly Prototyped Orthotweezers for Automated Microassembly , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Micky Rakotondrabe,et al.  Signal Measurement and Estimation Techniques for Micro and Nanotechnology. , 2011 .

[11]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Positioning accuracy characterization of assembled microscale components for micro-optical benches , 2014 .

[12]  Kui Sun,et al.  A novel optimal calibration algorithm on a dexterous 6 DOF serial robot-with the optimization of measurement poses number , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Zvi S. Roth,et al.  Fundamentals of Manipulator Calibration , 1991 .

[14]  Laurent Robert,et al.  Position-referenced microscopy for live cell culture monitoring , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[15]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  The Calibration Index and Taxonomy for Robot Kinematic Calibration Methods , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  Arm signature identification , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Piston Motion Performance Analysis of a 3DOF Electrothermal MEMS Scanner for Medical Applications , 2014 .

[18]  Jean-Ochin Abrahamians,et al.  A Nanorobotic System for In Situ Stiffness Measurements on Membranes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[19]  Dan O. Popa,et al.  ${\rm M}^{3}$-Deterministic, Multiscale, Multirobot Platform for Microsystems Packaging: Design and Quasi-Static Precision Evaluation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[20]  Ping Zhang,et al.  μ3: Multiscale, Deterministic Micro-Nano Assembly System for Construction of On-Wafer Microrobots , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  A. Seifert,et al.  Scanning and Tunable Micro-Optics for Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography , 2011, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[22]  Philippe Lemoine,et al.  Comparison study of the geometric parameters calibration methods , 2000 .

[23]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  A fast and precise micropipette positioning system based on continuous camera-robot recalibration and visual servoing , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[24]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots , 2003 .

[25]  Dong Sun,et al.  Automatic transportation of biological cells with a robot-tweezer manipulation system , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[26]  Rudy Moddemeijer On the determination of the position of extrema of sampled correlators , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[27]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[28]  Srinivas Akella,et al.  Coordinating Multiple Droplets in Planar Array Digital Microfluidic Systems , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[29]  Dan O. Popa,et al.  Interval Analysis of Kinematic Errors in Serial Manipulators Using Product of Exponentials Formula , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[30]  Patrick Sandoz,et al.  Pseudo-Periodic Encryption of Extended 2-D Surfaces for High Accurate Recovery of any Random Zone by Vision , 2010 .

[31]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Active force control for robotic micro-assembly: Application to guiding tasks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[32]  Yu Sun,et al.  Observability index selection for robot calibration , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[33]  Morris Driels,et al.  Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments , 1990, J. Field Robotics.

[34]  Chia-Hsiang Menq,et al.  Determination of Optimal Measurement Configurations for Robot Calibration Based on Observability Measure , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[35]  P Sandoz,et al.  Position referencing in optical microscopy thanks to sample holders with out‐of‐focus encoded patterns , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[36]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Algorithms and Software for Nanomanipulation with Atomic Force Microscopes , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[37]  Éric Marchand,et al.  CAD Model-based Tracking and 3D Visual-based Control for MEMS Microassembly , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..