A feasible incentive contract between a manufacturer and his fairness-sensitive retailer engaged in strategic marketing efforts

This paper considers a feasible incentive contract between a manufacturer and a fairness-sensitive retailer. The manufacturer (he) dominates the supply chain and determines his wholesale price, while the retailer (she) focuses on marketing and retailing. Thus, the retailer’s decision concerns her marketing efforts and retail price. The market demand is linked directly to the retailer’s marketing efforts and retail price. Therefore, we find that the retailer’s fairness preference leads her to engage in high-level marketing efforts, but causes the manufacturer to set a low wholesale price. A strategic decision-making approach that the manufacturer can employ is to consider the retailer’s fairness sensitivity. We also find that the retailer’s concern for fairness influences the manufacturer’s decisions strongly and affects his expected profit negatively. The manufacturer dominates the supply chain, thereby motivating him to design a feasible incentive contract to maximize his expected profit. Thus, a fairness-embedded profit-sharing contract applied with a Nash bargaining process is proposed to maximize the manufacturer’s expected profit. Both mathematical derivations and numerical studies show that the incentive contract leads to Pareto improvement in the utilities of the manufacturer and the retailer.

[1]  Jianbin Li,et al.  Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  H. Sebastian Heese,et al.  Controlling a supplier’s subcontracting decisions through contractual enforcement or economic incentives , 2015 .

[3]  Xuanming Su Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models , 2007 .

[4]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  Reactions to Perceived Inequity in U.S. and Dutch Interorganizational Relationships , 2002 .

[5]  Deyi Xue,et al.  Prediction of manufacturing resource requirements from customer demands in mass-customisation production , 2009 .

[6]  Terry A. Taylor,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination Under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Feng Chu,et al.  A Stackelberg game and its improvement in a VMI system with a manufacturing vendor , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[9]  John R. Nevin,et al.  How Fairness Garners Loyalty in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: Role of Trust in the Wholesaler-Pharmacy Relationship , 2009 .

[10]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Implications of Renegotiation for Optimal Contract Flexibility and Investment , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Tony Haitao Cui,et al.  Fairness and Channel Coordination , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Michael G. Harvey,et al.  Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice , 2006 .

[13]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Cooperative advertising, game theory and manufacturer-retailer supply chains , 2002 .

[14]  R. Radner,et al.  The Sealed-Bid Mechanism: An Experimental Study* , 1989 .

[15]  Liang-Tu Chen,et al.  Multi-period channel coordination in vendor-managed inventory for deteriorating goods , 2012 .

[16]  Elena Katok,et al.  Wholesale Pricing under Mild and Privately Known Concerns for Fairness , 2014 .

[17]  Yaozhong Wu,et al.  Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Tiaojun Xiao,et al.  Coordinating a supply chain with a quality assurance policy via a revenue-sharing contract , 2011 .

[19]  Elena Katok,et al.  Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study , 2013 .

[20]  Chengbin Chu,et al.  Newsvendor model for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns , 2014 .

[21]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling , 1985 .

[22]  Liang Liang,et al.  Horizontal cooperative programmes and cooperative advertising , 2014 .

[23]  Xinhui Zhang,et al.  A stochastic production planning model under uncertain seasonal demand and market growth , 2011 .

[24]  Roman Kapuscinski,et al.  Coordinating Contracts for Decentralized Supply Chains with Retailer Promotional Effort , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Jing Yang,et al.  Cooperative advertising in a distribution channel with fairness concerns , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[27]  Marcus Kunter,et al.  Coordination via cost and revenue sharing in manufacturer-retailer channels , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Xiaole Wu,et al.  Fairness in Selling to the Newsvendor , 2013 .

[29]  Jennifer Shang,et al.  Contract design for two-stage supply chain coordination: Integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts , 2013 .

[30]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers , 1995 .

[31]  Yu-Chung Tsao,et al.  Dynamic pricing, promotion and replenishment policies for a deteriorating item under permissible delay in payments , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  J. Nash Two-Person Cooperative Games , 1953 .

[33]  M. Parlar,et al.  Lead-time reduction in a two-level supply chain : non-cooperative equilibria vs. coordination with a profit-sharing contract , 2009 .

[34]  S. Padel,et al.  Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food , 2005 .

[35]  Xiaohang Yue,et al.  Optimal Contract Design for Mixed Channels Under Information Asymmetry , 2008 .

[36]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Generalized Nash Bargaining Solution for bandwidth allocation , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[37]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Distributional and Peer-Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design , 2013, Production and Operations Management.

[38]  Omkar D. Palsule-Desai Supply chain coordination using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts , 2013 .

[39]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  Designing Pricing Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers: Does the Framing of the Fixed Fee Matter? , 2008, Manag. Sci..