Control-Structure Interaction for Space Station Solar Dynamic Power Module

The feasibility of using conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and an alternative optimal control to perform the pointing and tracking functions of the Space Station solar dynamic power module is investigated. A very large state model of 6 rigid body modes and 272 flexible modes is used in conjunction with classical linear-quadraticGaussian (LQG) optimal control to produce a fullorder controller which satisfies the requirements. The results are compared with a classically designed PID controller that was implemented for a much smaller (6 rigid body, 40 flexible modes) model. From the results, the feasibility of a conventional PID solar dynamic control

[1]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  Optimal control study for the Space Station solar dynamic power module , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  A Parallel Algorithm for the Matrix Sign Function , 1990, Int. J. High Speed Comput..

[3]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  On Scaling Newton's Method for Polar Decomposition and the Matrix Sign Function , 1990 .

[4]  M. Safonov,et al.  A Schur Method for Balanced Model Reduction , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[5]  R. Byers Solving the algebraic Riccati equation with the matrix sign function , 1987 .

[6]  A. Laub A schur method for solving algebraic Riccati equations , 1978, 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[7]  C. Gregory Reduction of large flexible spacecraft models using internal balancing theory , 1984 .

[8]  Wodek Gawronski,et al.  Model reduction for flexible space structures , 1989 .

[9]  A. Laub,et al.  Rational iterative methods for the matrix sign function , 1991 .

[10]  M. Safonov,et al.  Optimal Hankel model reduction for nonminimal systems , 1990 .

[11]  Yousef Saad,et al.  A Parallel Block Cyclic Reduction Algorithm for the Fast Solution of Elliptic Equations , 1987, ICS.

[12]  Gerald Bierman Computational aspects of the matrix sign function solution to the ARE , 1984, The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  K. Glover All optimal Hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their L, ∞ -error bounds† , 1984 .

[14]  J. J. Cheng,et al.  Control-structure interaction study for the Space Station solar dynamic power module , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  Positive and negative solution of dual Riccati equations by matrix sign function iteration , 1989 .

[16]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Efficient Parallel Solution of Parabolic Equations: Implicit Methods on the Cedar Multicluster , 1989, PPSC.

[17]  Leonard M. Silverman,et al.  Singular value analysis of deformable systems , 1981, 1981 20th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[18]  Yousef Saad,et al.  On the parallel solution of parabolic equations , 1989, ICS '89.

[19]  J. D. Roberts,et al.  Linear model reduction and solution of the algebraic Riccati equation by use of the sign function , 1980 .

[20]  Alan J. Laub,et al.  On Scaling Newton's Method for Polar Decomposition and the Matrix Sign Function , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.