Facebook Use in Western European Local Governments: An Overall View

The objective of this chapter is to provide an initial assessment of Facebook use by Western European municipalities considering two aspects: citizens’ engagement and municipalities’ activity. The sample for this study comprises the 15 earliest member countries of the EU represented by the five largest cities of each. Thus, data on 75 local governments are employed to test the following research questions: (1) How are Western European municipalities using Facebook? and (2) How are citizens engaging with their local government by using Facebook? In order to answer these questions, a set of metrics will be used that can help governments interpret and understand their impact in the use of social media. The answers to these questions will help to determine whether the use of social media is indeed increasing citizen participation in local governance. Results show that the use of Facebook by some of the biggest Western European local governments has become commonplace. Thus, the availability of a Facebook page is confirmed as a symbol of modernity and responsiveness, which may be perceived as particularly necessary for political legitimacy, especially in times of crisis. The audiences of the official Facebook pages of Western European municipalities are rather high. But a high number of fans does not automatically mean an engaged audience and citizen engagement, in general, is still low. Therefore, these findings suggest that the interest is limited on the part of citizens in terms of engaging in conversations with local governments.

[1]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A Three‐Stage Adoption Process for Social Media Use in Government , 2013 .

[2]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[3]  Staci M. Zavattaro.  Social Media in Public Administration’s Future , 2013 .

[4]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[5]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[6]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  A. Farazmand.  The Future of Public Administration , 2012 .

[8]  Lori A. Brainard,et al.  Virtual Government–Citizen Relations , 2010 .

[9]  Staci M. Zavattaro,et al.  Social Media and Public Administration , 2011 .

[10]  L. Torres,et al.  E-Governance Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government’s Relationship with Citizens , 2006 .

[11]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Ioannis Chorianopoulos.  Urban Restructuring and Governance: North-South Differences in Europe and the EU URBAN Initiative , 2000 .

[13]  C. Weare,et al.  Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? , 2000 .

[14]  Karen Purser.  Using Social Media in Local Government: 2011 Survey Report , 2012 .

[15]  Rhoda C. Joseph.  E-Government Meets Social Media: Realities and Risks , 2012, IT Professional.

[16]  Deborah Agostino,et al.  Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities , 2013 .

[17]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.

[18]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Bert-Jaap Koops,et al.  Government 2.0: key challenges to its realization , 2012 .

[20]  A. Ho,et al.  Explaining the Adoption of E-Government Features , 2004 .

[21]  John T. Snead.  Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Maeve Duggan,et al.  Social Media Update 2016 , 2016 .

[23]  Scott Wright.  Political blogs, representation and the public sphere , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[24]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[25]  D. Norris,et al.  Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? , 2013 .

[26]  Hélène Michel,et al.  On the Way to the Learning City? A Typology of Citizenship Management Using ICTs , 2005, ECEG.

[27]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Sonia Royo,et al.  What is Driving the Increasing Presence of Citizen Participation Initiatives? , 2010 .

[29]  Nick Ellison,et al.  DEVELOPING POLITICAL CONVERSATIONS? , 2013 .

[30]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research , 2005 .

[31]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Facebook Practices in Western European Municipalities , 2017 .

[32]  Alexander Schellong,et al.  An Analysis of eParticipation and Web 2.0 Applications of Germany's 50 largest Cities and 16 Federal States , 2010 .

[33]  Sonia Royo,et al.  E‐Participation and Environmental Protection: Are Local Governments Really Committed? , 2014 .

[34]  E. Malthouse,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness , 2009 .

[35]  Yumi Jung,et al.  Engagement across three social media platforms: An exploratory study of a cause-related PR campaign , 2013 .

[36]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..