Modelling of Autonomous Search and Rescue Missions by Interval-Valued Neutrosophic WASPAS Framework

The application of autonomous robots in search and rescue missions represents a complex task which requires a robot to make robust decisions in unknown and dangerous environments. However, imprecise robot movements and small measurement errors obtained by robot sensors can have an impact on the autonomous environment exploration quality, and therefore, should be addressed while designing search and rescue (SAR) robots. In this paper, a novel frontier evaluation strategy is proposed, that address technical, economic, social, and environmental factors of the sustainable environment exploration process, and a new extension of the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method, modelled under interval-valued neutrosophic sets (IVNS), is introduced for autonomous mobile robots. The general-purpose Pioneer 3-AT robot platform is applied in simulated search and rescue missions, and the conducted experimental assessment shows the proposed method efficiency in commercial and public-type building exploration. By addressing the estimated measurement errors in the initial data obtained by the robot sensors, the proposed decision-making framework provides additional reliability for comparing and ranking candidate frontiers. The interval-valued multi-criteria decision-making method combined with the proposed frontier evaluation strategy enables the robot to exhaustively explore and map smaller SAR mission environments as well as ensure robot safety and efficient energy consumption in relatively larger public-type building environments.

[1]  Mirela Teodorescu,et al.  A Unifying Field in Logics. Book Review , 2014 .

[2]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Novel Rough WASPAS Approach for Supplier Selection in a Company Manufacturing PVC Carpentry Products , 2018, Inf..

[3]  Shu Jiang,et al.  A Study of Initiative Decision-Making in Distributed Human-Robot Teams , 2019, 2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC).

[4]  Barry Lennox,et al.  A review of ground-based robotic systems for the characterization of nuclear environments , 2019, Progress in Nuclear Energy.

[5]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[6]  Frances Zhu,et al.  Learned and Controlled Autonomous Robotic Exploration in an Extreme, Unknown Environment , 2019, 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[7]  Arnoud Visser,et al.  16 Years of RoboCup Rescue , 2016, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[8]  Romualdas Bausys,et al.  Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[9]  Clara M. Ionescu,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Real-Time Autonomous Navigation System Applied to Lego Robots , 2018 .

[10]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A Novel Rough Range of Value Method (R-ROV) for Selecting Automatically Guided Vehicles (AGVs) , 2018 .

[11]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[12]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  Exploring the ethical landscape of robot-assisted Search and Rescue , 2017 .

[13]  F. Smarandache A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. , 1999 .

[14]  Jianfeng Ding,et al.  Autonomous Robotic Exploration Based on Frontier Point Optimization and Multistep Path Planning , 2019, IEEE Access.

[15]  Konrad Rudin,et al.  Introduction to the Use of Robotic Tools for Search and Rescue , 2017 .

[16]  Romualdas Bausys,et al.  Sustainable Assessment of Alternative Sites for the Construction of a Waste Incineration Plant by Applying WASPAS Method with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set , 2015 .

[17]  Todd Litman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning , 2015 .

[18]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Their Application in Multicriteria Decision Making Problems , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[20]  Carlos Balaguer,et al.  Tunnel structural inspection and assessment using an autonomous robotic system , 2018 .

[21]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  Ethics for Robots as Experimental Technologies: Pairing Anticipation with Exploration to Evaluate the Social Impact of Robotics , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[22]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee Developing an MCDM method for robot selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2016 .

[23]  Nicola Basilico,et al.  A Decision-Theoretic Framework to Select Effective Observation Locations in Robotic Search and Rescue Scenarios , 2010 .

[24]  David E. Bloom,et al.  Global employment and decent jobs, 2010–2030: The forces of demography and automation , 2019, International Social Security Review.

[25]  Brian Yamauchi,et al.  A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration , 1997, Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation CIRA'97. 'Towards New Computational Principles for Robotics and Automation'.

[26]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[27]  Fredrik Heintz,et al.  Efficient Autonomous Exploration Planning of Large-Scale 3-D Environments , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[28]  Peter Stone,et al.  Desiderata for Planning Systems in General-Purpose Service Robots , 2019, ArXiv.

[29]  Wesley H. Huang,et al.  Autonomous door opening and traversal , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA).

[30]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2010 .

[31]  Dominik Mahr,et al.  Value of social robots in services: social cognition perspective , 2019, Journal of Services Marketing.

[32]  Hendrik Kolvenbach,et al.  SpaceBok: A Dynamic Legged Robot for Space Exploration , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[33]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Integrated multi-criteria evaluation of house’s plan shape based on the EDAS and SWARA methods , 2017 .

[34]  Pierre Michaud,et al.  A semi-autonomous mobile robot for bridge inspection , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[35]  Arturo Gil,et al.  A comparison of path planning strategies for autonomous exploration and mapping of unknown environments , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[36]  Barry Lennox,et al.  Exploration in Extreme Environments with Swarm Robotic System , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM).

[37]  F. Cavallaro,et al.  Application of Sustainability Principles for Harsh Environment Exploration by Autonomous Robot , 2019, Sustainability.

[38]  A. Ijspeert,et al.  Environmental monitoring using autonomous vehicles: a survey of recent searching techniques. , 2017, Current Opinion in Biotechnology.

[39]  T. Miranda Lakshmi,et al.  A Survey on Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods and Its Applications , 2013 .

[40]  Patrick Taillandier,et al.  Using the PROMETHEE multi-criteria decision making method to define new exploration strategies for rescue robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics.

[41]  Zoltan-Csaba Marton,et al.  Towards Autonomous Planetary Exploration , 2019 .

[42]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  Selection of Lead-Zinc Flotation Circuit Design by Applying Waspas Method with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set , 2017 .

[43]  Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman,et al.  A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..