Mechanism design for Variable Stiffness Actuation based on enumeration and analysis of performance

This paper presents a systematic enumeration and performance analysis of Variable Stiffness Actuators (VSAs). VSAs are becoming more and more popular in robotics, and many different prototypes have been recently proposed and built in the research community. In comparison with conventional geared motors, actuators with variable stiffness introduce the need for new specifications, requirements, and performance criteria, concerning e.g. the range of achievable stiffness, and the response time to stiffness reference changes. On the other hand, the mechanical construction of VSAs is also more complex. To address the problem of harnessing the increased complexity of VSA design, we consider in this article the enumeration of all possible arrangements of two prime movers (elementary motors), two harmonic-drive gears, the output shaft, and the interconnections (either rigid or elastic) between these elements. We propose an automated algorithm to search the large combinatorics of such enumeration, and present a reduced number of feasible basic designs which accomplish the objectives of VS actuation. Furthermore, we propose a quasi-static model of VS actuators which can be used for an analysis of their performance and we conclude by presenting some preliminary characteristics of one of the selected designs.

[1]  D. De Rossi,et al.  Electroactive Elastomeric Actuator for All-Polymer Linear Peristaltic Pumps , 2010, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[2]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Timothy D. Tuttle,et al.  Understanding and Modeling the Behavior of a Harmonic Drive Gear Transmission , 1992 .

[4]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Realization of dynamic biped walking varying joint stiffness using antagonistic driven joints , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[6]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Comparison of Mechanical Design and Energy Consumption of Adaptable, Passive-compliant Actuators , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Design and Control of a Bio-inspired Human-friendly Robot , 2010 .

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Dealing with the Safety-Performance Tradeoff in Robot Arms Design and Control , 2004 .

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Physical Human-Robot Interaction via Crash-Testing , 2007, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[11]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[13]  Sungchul Kang,et al.  A variable stiffness joint using leaf springs for robot manipulators , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable compliant actuator with stiffening characteristic for energy efficient hopping , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Stephen P. DeWeerth,et al.  Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  R. Ham,et al.  Compliant actuator designs , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.