Action observation in the infant brain: The role of body form and motion

Much research has been carried out to understand how human brains make sense of another agent in motion. Current views based on human adult and monkey studies assume a matching process in the motor system biased toward actions performed by conspecifics and present in the observer's motor repertoire. However, little is known about the neural correlates of action cognition in early ontogeny. In this study, we examined the processes involved in the observation of full body movements in 4-month-old infants using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to measure localized brain activation. In a 2 × 2 design, infants watched human or robotic figures moving in a smooth, familiar human-like manner, or in a rigid, unfamiliar robot-like manner. We found that infant premotor cortex responded more strongly to observe robot-like motion compared with human-like motion. Contrary to current views, this suggests that the infant motor system is flexibly engaged by novel movement patterns. Moreover, temporal cortex responses indicate that infants integrate information about form and motion during action observation. The response patterns obtained in premotor and temporal cortices during action observation in these young infants are very similar to those reported for adults. These findings thus suggest that the brain processes involved in the analysis of an agent in motion in adults become functionally specialized very early in human development.

[1]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Linking form and motion in the primate brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[4]  Fani Deligianni,et al.  Early cortical specialization for face-to-face communication in human infants , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  M. Lieberman Social Cognitive Neuroscience , 2010 .

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[10]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Schubotz Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  W. Prinz,et al.  Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches , 1990 .

[13]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Racial Bias Reduces Empathic Sensorimotor Resonance with Other-Race Pain , 2010, Current Biology.

[14]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Neural mirroring systems: Exploring the EEG mu rhythm in human infancy , 2011, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Motor System Activation Reveals Infants’ On-Line Prediction of Others’ Goals , 2010, Psychological science.

[16]  C. Keysers,et al.  Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  David A. Boas,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS Recordings during Functional Brain Activation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[19]  J. Mehler,et al.  The neonate brain detects speech structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  V. Gallese,et al.  Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[21]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Janny C. Stapel,et al.  Motor activation during observation of unusual versus ordinary actions in infancy , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[25]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  The processing of prosody: Evidence of interhemispheric specialization at the age of four , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[27]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Perception of biomechanical motions by infants: implementation of various processing constraints. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A. Blasi,et al.  Illuminating the developing brain: The past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  Jessica A. Sommerville,et al.  Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Hellmuth Obrig,et al.  Synchronization between Background Activity and Visually Evoked Potential Is Not Mirrored by Focal Hyperoxygenation: Implications for the Interpretation of Vascular Brain Imaging , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  W. Prinz A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .

[33]  K. Jellinger Motor Cognition What Actions Tell the Self , 2007 .

[34]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Triangles have goals too: Understanding action representation in left aIPS , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants , 2009, Biology Letters.

[36]  U. Castiello,et al.  The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.

[37]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Infant's brain responses to live and televised action , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  S. Bunce,et al.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. , 2007, Neuroreport.

[40]  J. Mehler,et al.  Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  A. Villringer,et al.  Beyond the Visible—Imaging the Human Brain with Light , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[43]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Detection of Communicative Signals Directed at the Self in Infant Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Selective prefrontal cortex responses to joint attention in early infancy , 2010, Biology Letters.

[45]  Nick Everdell,et al.  Social perception in infancy: a near infrared spectroscopy study. , 2009, Child development.

[46]  Hein T. van Schie,et al.  You'll never crawl alone: Neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy , 2008, NeuroImage.

[47]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[48]  Nick Everdell,et al.  Selective Cortical Mapping of Biological Motion Processing in Young Infants , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.