Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods

One of the surprising recurring phenomena observed in experiments with boosting is that the test error of the generated classifier usually does not increase as its size becomes very large, and often is observed to decrease even after the training error reaches zero. In this paper, we show that this phenomenon is related to the distribution of margins of the training examples with respect to the generated voting classification rule, where the margin of an example is simply the difference between the number of correct votes and the maximum number of votes received by any incorrect label. We show that techniques used in the analysis of Vapnik's support vector classifiers and of neural networks with small weights can be applied to voting methods to relate the margin distribution to the test error. We also show theoretically and experimentally that boosting is especially effective at increasing the margins of the training examples. Finally, we compare our explanation to those based on the bias-variance

[1]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Chervonenkis: On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities , 1971 .

[2]  Norbert Sauer,et al.  On the Density of Families of Sets , 1972, J. Comb. Theory A.

[3]  L. Devroye.  Bounds for the Uniform Deviation of Empirical Measures , 1982 .

[4]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[5]  David Haussler,et al.  What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization? , 1989, Neural Computation.

[6]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority , 1995, COLT '90.

[7]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority , 1990, COLT '90.

[8]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[9]  L. Jones.  A Simple Lemma on Greedy Approximation in Hilbert Space and Convergence Rates for Projection Pursuit Regression and Neural Network Training , 1992 .

[10]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[11]  Andrew R. Barron,et al.  Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning , 1994 .

[13]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Error-Correcting Output Coding Corrects Bias and Variance , 1995, ICML.

[14]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Boosting Decision Trees , 1995, NIPS.

[15]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[16]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Solving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes , 1994, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[17]  Y. Freund.  Boosting a Weak Learning Algorithm by Majority to Be Published in Information and Computation , 1995 .

[18]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  The importance of convexity in learning with squared loss , 1998, COLT '96.

[19]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  Efficient agnostic learning of neural networks with bounded fan-in , 1996, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  A framework for structural risk minimisation , 1996, COLT '96.

[21]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm , 1996, ICML.

[22]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Bagging, Boosting, and C4.5 , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.

[23]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Game theory, on-line prediction and boosting , 1996, COLT '96.

[24]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bias, Variance and Prediction Error for Classification Rules , 1996 .

[25]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  For Valid Generalization the Size of the Weights is More Important than the Size of the Network , 1996, NIPS.

[26]  Christopher J. Merz,et al.  UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases , 1996 .

[27]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bias, Variance , And Arcing Classifiers , 1996 .

[28]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Bias Plus Variance Decomposition for Zero-One Loss Functions , 1996, ICML.

[29]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Training Methods for Adaptive Boosting of Neural Networks , 1997, NIPS.

[30]  Holger Schwenk Yoshua.  Adaptive Boosting of Neural Networks for Character Recognition , 1997 .

[31]  C. Darken,et al.  Constructive Approximation Rates of Convex Approximation in Non-hilbert Spaces , 2022 .

[32]  David W. Opitz,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Bagging and Boosting , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[33]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[34]  Harris Drucker,et al.  Improving Regressors using Boosting Techniques , 1997, ICML.

[35]  Robert E. Schapire,et al.  Using output codes to boost multiclass learning problems , 1997, ICML.

[36]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  The Sample Complexity of Pattern Classification with Neural Networks: The Size of the Weights is More Important than the Size of the Network , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[37]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Improved Boosting Algorithms Using Confidence-rated Predictions , 1998, COLT' 98.

[38]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Structural Risk Minimization Over Data-Dependent Hierarchies , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[39]  Dale Schuurmans,et al.  Boosting in the Limit: Maximizing the Margin of Learned Ensembles , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[40]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  The Importance of Convexity in Learning with Squared Loss , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[41]  L. Breiman.  Arcing Classifiers , 1998 .

[42]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Improved Boosting Algorithms Using Confidence-rated Predictions , 1998, COLT' 98.

[43]  Y. Freund,et al.  Adaptive game playing using multiplicative weights , 1999 .