Coding of navigational affordances in the human visual system

Significance As we move about the world, we use vision to determine where we can go in our local environment and where our path is blocked. Despite the ubiquity of this problem, little is known about how it is solved by the brain. Here we show that a specific region in the human visual system, known as the occipital place area, automatically encodes the structure of navigable space in visual scenes, thus providing evidence for a bottom-up visual mechanism for perceiving potential paths for movement in one’s immediate surroundings. These findings are consistent with classic theoretical work predicting that sensory systems are optimized for processing environmental features that afford ecologically relevant behaviors, including the fundamental behavior of navigation. A central component of spatial navigation is determining where one can and cannot go in the immediate environment. We used fMRI to test the hypothesis that the human visual system solves this problem by automatically identifying the navigational affordances of the local scene. Multivoxel pattern analyses showed that a scene-selective region of dorsal occipitoparietal cortex, known as the occipital place area, represents pathways for movement in scenes in a manner that is tolerant to variability in other visual features. These effects were found in two experiments: One using tightly controlled artificial environments as stimuli, the other using a diverse set of complex, natural scenes. A reconstruction analysis demonstrated that the population codes of the occipital place area could be used to predict the affordances of novel scenes. Taken together, these results reveal a previously unknown mechanism for perceiving the affordance structure of navigable space.

[1]  J. Gibson Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[2]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[5]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  E. Maguire The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[8]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[10]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Viewpoint-Specific Scene Representations in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[12]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Russell A. Epstein The cortical basis of visual scene processing , 2005 .

[15]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[17]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre,et al.  Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Russell A. Epstein Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  D. Heeger,et al.  Decoding and Reconstructing Color from Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Real-World Scene Representations in High-Level Visual Cortex: It's the Spaces More Than the Places , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Soojin Park,et al.  Disentangling Scene Content from Spatial Boundary: Complementary Roles for the Parahippocampal Place Area and Lateral Occipital Complex in Representing Real-World Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Anterior Hippocampus and Goal-Directed Spatial Decision Making , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Heeger,et al.  Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Object Ensemble Processing in Human Anterior-Medial Ventral Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Retrosplenial Cortex Codes for Permanent Landmarks , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  Jennifer K. E. Steeves,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Transverse Occipital Sulcus Affects Scene but Not Object Processing , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Neural systems for landmark-based wayfinding in humans , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Anchoring the neural compass: Coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Bar,et al.  Scene Vision: Making Sense of What We See , 2014 .

[39]  Russell A. Epstein Neural Systems for Visual Scene Recognition , 2014 .

[40]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A Retinotopic Basis for the Division of High-Level Scene Processing between Lateral and Ventral Human Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Outside Looking In: Landmark Generalization in the Human Navigational System , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Parallel specification of competing sensorimotor control policies for alternative action options , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual scenes are categorized by function. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Perceived egocentric distance sensitivity and invariance across scene-selective cortex , 2016, Cortex.

[45]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  Evaluating the correspondence between face-, scene-, and object-selectivity and retinotopic organization within lateral occipitotemporal cortex , 2016, Journal of vision.

[46]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation , 2016, Current Biology.