Multiple-Model Set-Valued Observers: A new tool for HRF model selection in fMRI

This paper proposes a new approach for the selection of a biophysical model describing the haemodynamic response function (HRF) measured in BOLD-fMRI data, based on model falsification techniques. Specifically, the novel method of Multiple Model Set-Valued Observers (MMSVOs) is introduced. The observers consider that the initial state lives in a set, the linear time-varying dynamic system obtained from a bilinear approximation of the nonlinear HRF model about the nominal input signal is uncertain, and the output measurements are corrupted by bounded noise. It is shown, both theoretically and through simulation, that the proposed method is able to successfully distinguish the correct HRF model among a set of physiologically plausible alternatives. Moreover, the feasibility of the technique is demonstrated by its application to an empirical dataset. In summary, the results obtained clearly indicate that the proposed methodology is potentially well-suited to be used in the modeling of BOLD-fMRI data.

[1]  Andreas Johansson,et al.  A Sufficient Condition for Invalidation of Linear State-Space Systems With Uncertain Time-Varying Parameters , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  K. Glover,et al.  Identifiability of linear and nonlinear dynamical systems , 1976 .

[3]  Joseph J. DiStefano,et al.  On the relationships between structural identifiability and the controllability, observability properties , 1977 .

[4]  Pramod Khargonekar,et al.  A Time-Domain Approach to Model Validation , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[5]  Eric Walter,et al.  On the structural output distinguishability of parametric models, and its relations with structural identifiability , 1984 .

[6]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  C. Cobelli,et al.  On parameter and structural identifiability: Nonunique observability/reconstructibility for identifiable systems, other ambiguities, and new definitions , 1980 .

[9]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing hemodynamic models with DCM , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jeff S. Shamma,et al.  Set-valued observers and optimal disturbance rejection , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  Carlos Silvestre,et al.  Multiple-model adaptive control with set-valued observers , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[13]  Olivier Faugeras,et al.  Using nonlinear models in fMRI data analysis: Model selection and activation detection , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  F. Bianchi,et al.  Robust identification / invalidation in an LPV framework , 2010 .

[15]  Hongwei Lou,et al.  The distinguishability of linear control systems , 2009 .