Bargaining and the impartiality of the social contract

The question of what a group of rational agents would agree on were they to deliberate on how to organise society is central to all hypothetical social contract theories. If morality is to be based on a social contract, we need to know the terms of this contract. One type of social contract theory, contractarianism, aims to derive morality from rationality alone. Contractarians need to show, amongst other things, that rational and self-interested individuals would agree on an impartial division of a cooperative surplus. But it is often claimed that contractarians cannot show this without introducing moral assumptions. This paper argues that on the right understanding of the question contractarians are asking, these worries can be answered. Without relying on moral assumptions, the paper offers a novel derivation of symmetry, which is the axiom responsible for the impartiality of the most famous economic bargaining solutions appealed to by contractarians.

[1]  H. Moulin Implementing the Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution , 1984 .

[2]  W. Gaertner A Primer in Social Choice Theory , 2006 .

[3]  K. Taylor Natural justice. , 1998, The Lamp.

[4]  A. Morton Contractarianism and Rational Choice , 1993 .

[5]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  For the Abandonment of Symmetry in Game Theory , 1959 .

[6]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling , 1985 .

[7]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Playing for Real , 2007 .

[8]  Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. , 1956 .

[9]  Jules L. Coleman,et al.  Morality and the Theory of Rational Choice , 1987, Ethics.

[10]  D. Gauthier Morals by Agreement , 1987 .

[11]  T. Schelling The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[12]  Alan Hájek Most Counterfactuals Are False , 2014 .

[13]  John Thrasher Uniqueness and symmetry in bargaining theories of justice , 2014 .

[14]  R. B. Braithwaite,et al.  Theory of games as a tool for the moral philosopher : an inaugural lecture delivered in Cambridge on 2 December 1954 , 1956 .

[15]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  Andreas Wagener,et al.  Bargaining Solutions as Social Compromises , 2003 .

[17]  B. Skyrms Evolution of the social contract , 1996 .

[18]  R. B. Braithwaite,et al.  Theory of games as a tool for the moral philosopher ; An empricist's view of the nature of religious belief , 1994 .

[19]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  On the rationality postulates underlying the theory of cooperative games , 1961 .

[20]  J. Nash Two-Person Cooperative Games , 1953 .

[21]  Terje Lensberg,et al.  Stability and the Nash solution , 1988 .

[22]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[23]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[24]  Thomas Hobbes,et al.  LEVIATHAN Or the Matter Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil , 1946 .

[25]  E. Kalai,et al.  OTHER SOLUTIONS TO NASH'S BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1975 .

[26]  K. R. Minogue,et al.  THE LOGIC OF LEVIATHAN , 1970 .