Sharing Solutions: Persistence and Grounding in Multimodal Collaborative Problem Solving

This article reports on an exploratory study of the relationship between grounding and problem solving in multimodal computer-mediated collaboration. This article examines two different media, a shared whiteboard and a MOO environment that includes a text chat facility. A study was done on how the acknowledgment rate (how often partners give feedback of having perceived, understood, and accepted partner's contributions) varies according to the media and the content of interactions. It was expected that the whiteboard would serve to draw schemata that disambiguate chat utterances. Instead, results show that the whiteboard is primarily used to represent the state of problem solving and the chat is used for grounding information created on the whiteboard. These results are interpreted in terms of persistence: More persistent information is exchanged through the more persistent medium. The whiteboard was used as a shared memory rather than a grounding tool.

[1]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Grounding in Multi-modal Task-Oriented Collaboration , 1999 .

[2]  David R. Traum,et al.  Utterance Units in Spoken Dialogue , 1996, ECAI Workshop on Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems.

[3]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[5]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Managing problems in speaking , 1994, Speech Communication.

[6]  Joakim Nivre,et al.  On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Linguistic Feedback , 1992, J. Semant..

[7]  N. Webb.  Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[8]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Shared Workspaces: How Do They Work and When Are They Useful? , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[9]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[10]  M. Baker.  A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues , 1994 .

[11]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[12]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[13]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[14]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[15]  S. Yussen.  The growth of reflection in children , 1985 .

[16]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Why spatial metaphors are relevant to virtual campuses , 1999 .

[17]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit , 2000, Natural Language Engineering.

[18]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[19]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving , 1995 .

[20]  David M. Frohlich,et al.  The history and future of direct manipulation , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..