Multiple UAVs/UGVs heterogeneous coordinated technique based on Receding Horizon Control (RHC) and velocity vector control

Multiple unmanned air vehicles (UAVs)/unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) heterogeneous cooperation provides a new breakthrough for the effective application of UAV and UGV. On the basis of introduction of UAV/UGV mathematical model, the characteristics of heterogeneous flocking is analyzed in detail. Two key issues are considered in multi-UGV subgroups, which are Reynolds Rule and Virtual Leader (VL). Receding Horizon Control (RHC) with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is proposed for multiple UGVs flocking, and velocity vector control approach is adopted for multiple UAVs flocking. Then, multiple UAVs and UGVs heterogeneous tracking can be achieved by these two approaches. The feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed method are verified by comparative experiments with artificial potential field method.

[1]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Adaptive teams of autonomous aerial and ground robots for situational awareness , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[2]  Michael Trentini,et al.  Semi-autonomous UAV/UGV for dismounted urban operations , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Haibin Duan,et al.  Unmanned air/ground vehicles heterogeneous cooperative techniques: Current status and prospects , 2010 .

[4]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Luiz Chaimowicz,et al.  Deploying Air-Ground Multi-Robot Teams in Urban Environments , 2005 .

[6]  H.H.T. Liu,et al.  A cooperative UAV/UGV platform for wildfire detection and fighting , 2008, 2008 Asia Simulation Conference - 7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing.

[7]  K.B. Ariyur,et al.  Autonomous tracking of a ground vehicle by a UAV , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[8]  Herbert G. Tanner Flocking with obstacle avoidance in switching networks of interconnected vehicles , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[9]  H.G. Tanner,et al.  Cooperation between Aerial and Ground vehicle groups for Reconnaissance missions , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Joseph P. Loyall,et al.  A distributed real-time embedded application for surveillance, detection, and tracking of time critical targets , 2005, 11th IEEE Real Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium.

[11]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Stable flocking of mobile agents, part I: fixed topology , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[12]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[13]  Herbert G. Tanner,et al.  Hybrid velocity/force control for robot navigation in compliant unknown environments , 2006, Robotica.

[14]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Synergies in Feature Localization by Air-Ground Robot Teams , 2004, ISER.

[15]  G. Conte,et al.  Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Visual Servoing for Cooperative Indoor Exploration , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  G. Gowtham,et al.  Simulation of multi UAV flight formation , 2005, 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[17]  Jie Zou,et al.  Time-Delay Compensation of Heterogeneous Network Control for Multiple UAVs and UGVs , 2010 .

[18]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[19]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.