Measurement of the Relative Motion Between an Implant and Bone under Cyclic Loading

The measurement of the relative motion between a prosthesis and the surrounding bone is important for the pre-clinical testing of prostheses and implants. A technique that allows measurements to be made over several million loading cycles was developed by Maher et al. (Clin. Biomech. 2001; 16: 307-314). However, the measurement of implant/bone motion is fraught with difficulties because: (i) testing over millions of cycles can take several days and errors because of diurnal temperature variations can occur, (ii) elastic deformations of the stem could have a dominant effect on 'inducible displacements', the rate of change of which is hypothesised to be a measure of loosening, and (iii) the use of this method for the analysis of cementless prostheses has yet to be demonstrated. This paper addresses these methodological issues with respect to testing hip prostheses, and concludes with a comparative evaluation of pre-clinical testing methods.

[1]  W H Harris,et al.  Quantification of Implant Micromotion, Strain Shielding, and Bone Resorption With Porous‐Coated Anatomic Medullary Locking Femoral Prostheses , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  D W Murray,et al.  Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis for Assessing Migration of Total Hip Replacement Femoral Components , 1995, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  D W Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Methods for quantitative analysis of the primary stability in uncemented hip prostheses. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[5]  P J Gregg,et al.  A preliminary hip joint simulator study of the migration of a cemented femoral stem , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  H. Rubash,et al.  Micromotion measurements with hip center and modular neck length alterations. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Measurement of the migration of a cemented hip prosthesis in an in vitro test. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  P G Niederer,et al.  Comparison of the stability of press‐fit hip prosthesis femoral stems using a synthetic model femur , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  K. Hardinge Hip Replacement: The Facts , 1984 .

[10]  R E Jones,et al.  Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  K. Markolf,et al.  The effect of calcar contact on femoral component micromovement. A mechanical study. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  N. Verdonschot,et al.  Do unloading periods affect migration characteristics of cemented femoral components? An in vitro evaluation with the Exeter stem. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[14]  L. Nolte,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of cemented femoral stem stability: an in vitro cadaver study. , 2000, Clinical Biomechanics.

[15]  G. Kotzar,et al.  Femoral component loosening in hip arthroplasty. Cadaver study of subsidence and hoop strain. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[16]  W H Harris,et al.  Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  E Schneider,et al.  A comparative study of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The effect of collar and distal stem fixation on micromotion of the femoral stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  P S Walker,et al.  Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  M. Verhelpen,et al.  Mechanical simulator for the upper femur. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[21]  David W. Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR , 1999 .

[22]  C. Bünger,et al.  Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Issues in pre-clinical testing of implants , 2001 .

[25]  P S Walker,et al.  Relative motion of hip stems under load. An in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  L Claes,et al.  Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  John A. Szivek,et al.  Variability in the torsional and bending response of a commercially available composite “Femur” , 1990 .

[28]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Discriminating the loosening behaviour of cemented hip prostheses using measurements of migration and inducible displacement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  E P Lautenschlager,et al.  A computer-based biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion of cementless hip prostheses. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  J CHARNLEY,et al.  THE ELIMINATION OF SLIP BETWEEN PROSTHESIS AND FEMUR. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[33]  F. Pauwels,et al.  Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur funktionellen Anatomie des Bewegungsapparates , 1965 .

[34]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Stem curvature and load angle influence the initial relative bone‐implant motion of cementless femoral stems , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  E. Munting,et al.  Fixation and effect on bone strain pattern of a stemless hip prosthesis. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  M A Freeman,et al.  Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[37]  D. W. Bühler,et al.  Three-dimensional primary stability of cementless femoral stems. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[38]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Pre-clinical validation of a new partially cemented femoral prosthesis by synergetic use of numerical and experimental methods. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  J J Callaghan,et al.  The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Initial stability of uncemented hip stems: an in-vitro protocol to measure torsional interface motion. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[41]  A. Cappello,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  D. W. Bühler,et al.  Design and evaluation of a device for measuring three-dimensional micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[43]  J. Orr,et al.  An Investigation into the Fixation of Hip Replacements , 1991, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[44]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Mechanical simulation of muscle loading on the proximal femur: analysis of cemented femoral component migration with and without muscle loading. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[45]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.