Rate, not selectivity, determines neuronal population coding accuracy in auditory cortex

The notion that neurons with higher selectivity carry more information about external sensory inputs is widely accepted in neuroscience. High-selectivity neurons respond to a narrow range of sensory inputs, and thus would be considered highly informative by rejecting a large proportion of possible inputs. In auditory cortex, neuronal responses are less selective immediately after the onset of a sound and then become highly selective in the following sustained response epoch. These 2 temporal response epochs have thus been interpreted to encode first the presence and then the content of a sound input. Contrary to predictions from that prevailing theory, however, we found that the neural population conveys similar information about sound input across the 2 epochs in spite of the neuronal selectivity differences. The amount of information encoded turns out to be almost completely dependent upon the total number of population spikes in the read-out window for this system. Moreover, inhomogeneous Poisson spiking behavior is sufficient to account for this property. These results imply a novel principle of sensory encoding that is potentially shared widely among multiple sensory systems.

[1]  K. Harris,et al.  Population coding of tone stimuli in auditory cortex: dynamic rate vector analysis , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Peter Heil,et al.  Coding of temporal onset envelope in the auditory system , 2003, Speech Commun..

[3]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  A. Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic population codes and the exponential family of distributions. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[5]  Valentin Dragoi,et al.  Adaptive coding of visual information in neural populations , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Alan Carleton,et al.  Dynamic Ensemble Odor Coding in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb: Sensory Information at Different Timescales , 2008, Neuron.

[7]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Translation of Sensory Input into Behavioral Output via an Olfactory System , 2008, Neuron.

[8]  Paul V. Watkins,et al.  Specialized neuronal adaptation for preserving input sensitivity , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Pouget,et al.  Tuning curve sharpening for orientation selectivity: coding efficiency and the impact of correlations , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Giles Wilkeson Gray Phonemic microtomy: The minimum duration of perceptible speech sounds , 1942 .

[11]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[12]  Clara Suied,et al.  Auditory gist: recognition of very short sounds from timbre cues. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Przyborowski,et al.  Homogeneity of results in testing samples from Poisson series, with an application to testing clover seed for dodder. , 1940 .

[14]  G. Laurent,et al.  Transient Dynamics versus Fixed Points in Odor Representations by Locust Antennal Lobe Projection Neurons , 2005, Neuron.

[15]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[16]  G. Orban,et al.  How well do response changes of striate neurons signal differences in orientation: a study in the discriminating monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  C Giovanni Galizia,et al.  Olfactory Information Processing in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe: Anything Goes? , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Representation of Orientation on Different Finger Pads , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  W. Michael Brown,et al.  Optimal Neuronal Tuning for Finite Stimulus Spaces , 2004, Neural Computation.

[20]  V. Jayaraman,et al.  Intensity versus Identity Coding in an Olfactory System , 2003, Neuron.

[21]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  William Bialek,et al.  Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains , 1996, cond-mat/9603127.

[23]  Osamu Hoshino,et al.  Enhanced Sound Perception by Widespread-Onset Neuronal Responses in Auditory Cortex , 2007, Neural Computation.

[24]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  Sharpening of frequency tuning by inhibition in the central auditory system: tribute to Yasuji Katsuki , 1995, Neuroscience Research.

[25]  Michael Petrides,et al.  The marmoset brain in stereotaxic coordinates , 2012 .

[26]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Heil,et al.  Onset-Duration Matching of Acoustic Stimuli Revisited: Conventional Arithmetic vs. Proposed Geometric Measures of Accuracy and Precision , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Dissociated lateralization of transient and sustained blood oxygen level-dependent signal components in human primary auditory cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Contrast Tuning in Auditory Cortex , 2003, Science.

[30]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  The Effect of Noise Correlations in Populations of Diversely Tuned Neurons , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Brian J Malone,et al.  Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Dennis L Barbour,et al.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The stimulus duration required to identify vowels, their octave, and their pitch chroma , 1995 .

[35]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Edeline,et al.  A Neural Substrate for Rapid Timbre Recognition? Neural and Behavioral Discrimination of Very Brief Acoustic Vowels. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. , 1999, Science.

[38]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Narrow Versus Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[39]  Gregory C DeAngelis,et al.  Macaque Middle Temporal Neurons Signal Depth in the Absence of Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  D. Bendor,et al.  Neural response properties of primary, rostral, and rostrotemporal core fields in the auditory cortex of marmoset monkeys. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Multidimensional Encoding Strategy of Spiking Neurons , 2000, Neural Computation.

[42]  Sarah M N Woolley,et al.  Discrimination of communication vocalizations by single neurons and groups of neurons in the auditory midbrain. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Supporting Robust Discrimination of Spectrally and Temporally Degraded Speech , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[44]  Shawn R. Olsen,et al.  Sensory processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe increases reliability and separability of ensemble odor representations , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Tonal response patterns of primary auditory cortex neurons in alert cats , 2002, Brain Research.

[46]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  The Upward Bias in Measures of Information Derived from Limited Data Samples , 1995, Neural Computation.

[47]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  I. Whitfield,et al.  Classification of unit responses in the auditory cortex of the unanaesthetized and unrestrained cat , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  Michael P. Beddoes,et al.  Discrimination of vowel sounds of very short duration , 1972 .

[50]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Auditory Cortical Responses Elicited in Awake Primates by Random Spectrum Stimuli , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Lawrence D. Brown,et al.  A test for the poisson distribution , 2002 .

[52]  P Heggelund,et al.  Dynamics of spatial resolution of single units in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cat during brief visual stimulation. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  G. Recanzone Response profiles of auditory cortical neurons to tones and noise in behaving macaque monkeys , 2000, Hearing Research.

[54]  Steven M. Peterson,et al.  A spatiotemporal coding mechanism for background-invariant odor recognition , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli , 2005, Nature.

[56]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .