Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

When a stimulus supports two distinct interpretations, perception alternates in an irregular manner between them. What causes the bistable perceptual switches remains an open question. Most existing models assume that switches arise from a slow fatiguing process, such as adaptation or synaptic depression. We develop a new, attractor-based framework in which alternations are induced by noise and are absent without it. Our model goes beyond previous energy-based conceptualizations of perceptual bistability by constructing a neurally plausible attractor model that is implemented in both firing rate mean-field and spiking cell-based networks. The model accounts for known properties of bistable perceptual phenomena, most notably the increase in alternation rate with stimulation strength observed in binocular rivalry. Furthermore, it makes a novel prediction about the effect of changing stimulus strength on the activity levels of the dominant and suppressed neural populations, a prediction that could be tested with functional MRI or electrophysiological recordings. The neural architecture derived from the energy-based model readily generalizes to several competing populations, providing a natural extension for multistability phenomena.

[1]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Mean-Driven and Fluctuation-Driven Persistent Activity in Recurrent Networks , 2007, Neural Computation.

[3]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[4]  J. Hupé,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Auditory and Visual Bistability Reveal Common Principles of Perceptual Organization , 2006, Current Biology.

[5]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Yee-Joon Kim,et al.  Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  Néstor Parga,et al.  Auto- and crosscorrelograms for the spike response of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with slow synapses. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[9]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Perceptual Alternation Induced by Visual Transients , 2005, Perception.

[13]  Néstor Parga,et al.  Simple model neurons with AMPA and NMDA filters: role of synaptic time scales , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[14]  N. Parga,et al.  Membrane potential and response properties of populations of cortical neurons in the high conductance state. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[16]  A. Wilde,et al.  Now You See It, Now You Don't , 2004, Science's STKE.

[17]  C. Clifford,et al.  Perceptual Grouping of Biological Motion Promotes Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Current Biology.

[18]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[19]  Noboru Sugie,et al.  Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry in binocular vision , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  A Spiking Neuron Model for Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Effects of Neuromodulation in a Cortical Network Model of Object Working Memory Dominated by Recurrent Inhibition , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  K. Matsuoka The dynamic model of binocular rivalry , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  Mathias Bode,et al.  Lateral Neural Model of Binocular Rivalry , 2003, Neural Computation.

[24]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  David Alais,et al.  Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways , 2003, Vision Research.

[26]  A. Destexhe,et al.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Background Synaptic Activity as a Switch Between Dynamical States in a Network , 2003, Neural Computation.

[28]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Binocular rivalry and perceptual multi-stability , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  Nava Rubin,et al.  The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids , 2003, Vision Research.

[30]  N. Rubin,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability : plaids and binocular rivalry compared , 2003 .

[31]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[32]  R. Blake,et al.  V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[33]  N. Parga,et al.  Response of spiking neurons to correlated inputs. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[34]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Evidence for Perceptual “Trapping” and Adaptation in Multistable Binocular Rivalry , 2002, Neuron.

[35]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  A model of binocular rivalry based on competition in IT , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[36]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[38]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[40]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[41]  Frank Tong,et al.  Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution , 2001 .

[42]  R. Wootton,et al.  Structural colour: Now you see it — now you don't , 2001, Nature.

[43]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[44]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  The Temporal Course of Suppression during Binocular Rivalry , 2000, Perception.

[47]  Jonathan A. Marshall,et al.  Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry , 2000, Neurocomputing.

[48]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry , 2000, Current Biology.

[49]  M. Umemiya,et al.  Behaviour of NMDA and AMPA receptor‐mediated miniature EPSCs at rat cortical neuron synapses identified by calcium imaging , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  X. Wang,et al.  Synaptic Basis of Cortical Persistent Activity: the Importance of NMDA Receptors to Working Memory , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  N. Logothetis Single units and conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[53]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[54]  E. Lumer A neural model of binocular integration and rivalry based on the coordination of action-potential timing in primary visual cortex. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1998, Neural Computation.

[56]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[57]  B. Keller,et al.  Rapidly deactivating AMPA receptors determine excitatory synaptic transmission to interneurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius from rat. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[60]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[61]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[62]  The Cortical Neuron as an Electrophysiological Unit , 1995 .

[63]  Bialek,et al.  Random switching and optimal processing in the perception of ambiguous signals. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[64]  S. R. Lehky Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[66]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[67]  Hermann Haken A Brain Model For Vision in Terms of Synergetics , 1994 .

[68]  Riani,et al.  Stochastic resonance in the perceptual interpretation of ambiguous figures: A neural network model. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[69]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[70]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[72]  R. Blake,et al.  Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.

[74]  R. Blake A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[75]  S. R. Lehky An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[76]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[77]  H. Risken Fokker-Planck Equation , 1984 .

[78]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[79]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.

[80]  R. Blake,et al.  Is binocular vision always monocular? , 1978, Science.

[81]  P. Walker Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[82]  R. Fox,et al.  Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  L. Lack The effect of practice on binocular rivalry control , 1969 .

[84]  W J Levelt,et al.  Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[85]  W. Levelt The alternation process in binocular rivalry , 1966 .

[86]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[87]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[88]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[89]  Charles Wheatstone F.R.S. XXXVI. Contributions to the physiology of vision.—Part the First. On the some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phænomena of binocular vision , 1852 .

[90]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[91]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[92]  L. A. N. Esq.,et al.  LXI. Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid , 1832 .