Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task.

Can knowledge underlying a simple perceptual-motor skill be unconscious? Three experiments (a) trained participants on a 4-choice reaction time (RT) task in which the stimulus on each trial was determined by a repeating 12-element sequence and (b) studied the extent to which participants' knowledge of this sequence was implicit, that is, unavailable for conscious access. Participants proved via an indirect test to have acquired knowledge of the sequence, because their RTs increased when the sequence was changed. To evaluate whether this knowledge was consciously accessible, participants were asked to perform an "objective" free-generation or recognition test of sequence knowledge. Results show that sequence knowledge is fully accessible on these objective tests. Moreover, it is demonstrated in this procedure that old-new recognition cannot be explained by unconscious attribution of perceptual-motor fluency. The question is raised whether distinct implicit (procedural) and explicit (declarative) forms of knowledge are acquired when participants learn a perceptual-motor skill.

[1]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning , 1996 .

[2]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Simulating a Skilled Typist: A Study of Skilled Cognitive-Motor Performance , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  E. Reingold,et al.  Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: measuring recollection , 1993 .

[5]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Handbook of implicit learning , 1998 .

[6]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Implicit learning of loosely defined structures , 1998 .

[7]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  N. Brody.  Unconscious learning of rules: Comment on Reber's analysis of implicit learning. , 1989 .

[9]  E. Reingold,et al.  Theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes , 1990 .

[10]  D. Norman.  Learning and Memory , 1982 .

[11]  Shanks,et al.  Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks , 1998 .

[12]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  A Multinomial Model to Assess Fluency and Recollection in a Sequence Learning Task , 1997 .

[13]  L D Williams,et al.  Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[14]  A. Buchner.  Indirect effects of synthetic grammar learning in an identification task. , 1994 .

[15]  Veronica J. Dark,et al.  Perceptual Fluency and Recognition Judgments , 1985 .

[16]  Axel Buchner,et al.  On the Role of Fragmentary Knowledge in a Sequence Learning Task , 1998 .

[17]  Tim Curran,et al.  Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge , 1997, Psychological research.

[18]  M. Amorim,et al.  Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: evidence against dissociation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning , 1995 .

[20]  Z. Dienes,et al.  UNCONSCIOUS KNOWLEDGE OF ARTIFICIAL GRAMMARS IS APPLIED STRATEGICALLY , 1995 .

[21]  L. Squire,et al.  The structure and organization of memory. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[23]  M. Nissen,et al.  Implicit learning of new verbal associations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[25]  L. Squire,et al.  Encapsulation of Implicit and Explicit Memory in Sequence Learning , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Squire,et al.  Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[27]  S. Guttenplan.  Mind and language , 1975 .

[28]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[29]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Tim Curran,et al.  Higher-Order Associative Learning in Amnesia: Evidence from the Serial Reaction Time Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[33]  A. Healy,et al.  Long-term repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Emmanuel Bigand,et al.  The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks , 1997 .

[35]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[36]  Peter Bullemer,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989 .

[37]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .