Constrained optimization involving expensive function evaluations: A sequential approach

This paper presents a new sequential method for constrained non-linear optimization problems.The principal characteristics of these problems are very time consuming function evaluations and the absence of derivative information. Such problems are common in design optimization, where time consuming function evaluations are carried out by simulation tools (e.g., FEM, CFD).Classical optimization methods, based on derivatives, are not applicable because often derivative information is not available and is too expensive to approximate through finite differencing.The algorithm first creates an experimental design. In the design points the underlying functions are evaluated.Local linear approximations of the real model are obtained with help of weighted regression techniques.The approximating model is then optimized within a trust region to find the best feasible objective improving point.This trust region moves along the most promising direction, which is determined on the basis of the evaluated objective values and constraint violations combined in a filter criterion.If the geometry of the points that determine the local approximations becomes bad, i.e. the points are located in such a way that they result in a bad approximation of the actual model, then we evaluate a geometry improving instead of an objective improving point.In each iteration a new local linear approximation is built, and either a new point is evaluated (objective or geometry improving) or the trust region is decreased.Convergence of the algorithm is guided by the size of this trust region.The focus of the approach is on getting good solutions with a limited number of function evaluations (not necessarily on reaching high accuracy).

[1]  J. P. Kelly,et al.  New advances and applications of combining simulation and optimization , 1996, Proceedings Winter Simulation Conference.

[2]  H. Kunzi,et al.  Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1975 .

[3]  Hendrik Johannes Bergveld,et al.  Battery management systems : design by modelling , 2001 .

[4]  Ajg Bert Schoofs,et al.  Optimization of structural and acoustical parameters of bells , 1994 .

[5]  V. Torczon,et al.  Direct search methods: then and now , 2000 .

[6]  Virginia Torczon,et al.  DERIVATIVE-FREE PATTERN SEARCH METHODS FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN PROBLEMS , 1994 .

[7]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[9]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  UOBYQA: unconstrained optimization by quadratic approximation , 2002, Math. Program..

[10]  Virginia Torczon,et al.  PDS: Direct Search Methods for Unconstrained Optimization on Either Sequential or Parallel Machines , 1992 .

[11]  Dick den Hertog,et al.  Optimizing color picture tubes by high-cost nonlinear programming , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[13]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  On the use of quadratic models in unconstrained minimization without derivatives , 2004, Optim. Methods Softw..

[14]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Wedge trust region methods for derivative free optimization , 2002, Math. Program..

[15]  Herbert Hamers,et al.  On D-optimality based trust regions for black-box optimization problems , 2006 .

[16]  R. Weiner Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1985 .

[17]  Katya Scheinberg,et al.  Recent progress in unconstrained nonlinear optimization without derivatives , 1997, Math. Program..

[18]  Klaus Schittkowski,et al.  More test examples for nonlinear programming codes , 1981 .

[19]  Vassili Toropov,et al.  Multiparameter structural optimization using FEM and multipoint explicit approximations , 1993 .

[20]  O. Dykstra The Augmentation of Experimental Data to Maximize [X′X] , 1971 .

[21]  van Dh Dick Campen,et al.  Optimization of Multibody Systems Using Approximation Concepts , 1996 .

[22]  Otto Dykstra,et al.  The Augmentation of Experimental Data to Maximize |X′X|@@@The Augmentation of Experimental Data to Maximize |X prime X| , 1971 .

[23]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[24]  L. Watson,et al.  Reasonable Design Space Approach to Response Surface Approximation , 1999 .

[25]  Sven Leyffer,et al.  Nonlinear programming without a penalty function , 2002, Math. Program..

[26]  J. Dennis,et al.  MANAGING APPROXIMATION MODELS IN OPTIMIZATION , 2007 .

[27]  Herbert Hamers,et al.  A sequential approach to product and process design involving expensive function evaluation , 2001 .

[28]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  Least Frobenius norm updating of quadratic models that satisfy interpolation conditions , 2004, Math. Program..

[29]  Nicholas I. M. Gould,et al.  Trust Region Methods , 2000, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization.