Heritability of the Specific Cognitive Ability of Face Perception

What makes one person socially insightful but mathematically challenged, and another musically gifted yet devoid of a sense of direction? Individual differences in general cognitive ability are thought to be mediated by "generalist genes" that affect many cognitive abilities similarly without specific genetic influences on particular cognitive abilities [1]. In contrast, we present here evidence for cognitive "specialist genes": monozygotic twins are more similar than dizygotic twins in the specific cognitive ability of face perception. Each of three measures of face-specific processing was heritable, i.e., more correlated in monozygotic than dizygotic twins: face-specific recognition ability, the face-inversion effect [2], and the composite-face effect [3]. Crucially, this effect is due to the heritability of face processing in particular, not to a more general aspect of cognition such as IQ or global attention. Thus, individual differences in at least one specific mental talent are independently heritable. This finding raises the question of what other specific cognitive abilities are independently heritable and may elucidate the mechanisms by which heritable disorders like dyslexia and autism can have highly uneven cognitive profiles in which some mental processes can be selectively impaired while others remain unaffected or even selectively enhanced.

[1]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Guymer,et al.  Refractive errors in twin studies. , 2006, Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[3]  G. Marcus,et al.  Genes and domain specificity , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[5]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Cognitive Neuropsychology Family Resemblance: Ten Family Members with Prosopagnosia and Within-class Object Agnosia , 2022 .

[6]  V. Blinov,et al.  Genetic Correlates of Musical Pitch Recognition in Humans , 2007 .

[7]  Elinor McKone,et al.  The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach , 2007, Cognition.

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Matt McGue,et al.  Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex , 1984, Behavior genetics.

[10]  B Johansson,et al.  Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. , 1997, Science.

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences , 2009 .

[12]  Karl Sperling,et al.  Hereditary Prosopagnosia: the First Case Series , 2007, Cortex.

[13]  R. Fisher Statistical methods for research workers , 1927, Protoplasma.

[14]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[15]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Covey,et al.  Substantial Genetic Influence on Cognitive Abilities in Twins 80 or More Years Old , 1997 .

[18]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[19]  R. Horton Rules and representations , 1993, The Lancet.

[20]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Nature versus Nurture in Ventral Visual Cortex: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Twins , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Cognitive and Neural Development of Face Recognition in Humans , 2009 .

[24]  F. Simion,et al.  Newborns’ face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 2008, Cognition.

[25]  Allan Donner,et al.  Testing the equality of dependent intraclass correlation coefficients , 2002 .

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[28]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  N. Minshew,et al.  Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Y. Sugita Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Gaia Scerif,et al.  The dawn of cognitive genetics? Crucial developmental caveats , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[34]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  The representations of spacing and part-based information are associated for upright faces but dissociated for objects: Evidence from individual differences , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[36]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life? , 2002, Science.

[37]  A. Jensen,et al.  Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences , 2006 .

[38]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  R. Plomin Behavioral genetics. , 1991, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[40]  Harry Munsinger,et al.  The Syntactic Abilities of Identical Twins, Fraternal Twins, and Their Siblings. , 1976 .

[41]  W. Sommer,et al.  Toward a comprehensive test battery for face cognition: Assessment of the tasks , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[42]  P Graham,et al.  A twin study of genetic influences on reading and spelling ability and disability. , 1987, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[43]  Constance Scharff,et al.  FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[44]  I. McNish Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences , 2007 .

[45]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[46]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.