Making Sense by Building Sense: Kindergarten Children’s Construction and Understanding of Adaptive Robot Behaviors

This study explores young children’s ability to construct and explain adaptive behaviors of a behaving artifact, an autonomous mobile robot with sensors. A central component of the behavior construction environment is the RoboGan software that supports children’s construction of spatiotemporal events with an a-temporal rule structure. Six kindergarten children participated in the study, three girls and three boys. Activities and interviews were conducted individually along five sessions that included increasingly complex construction tasks. It was found that all of the children succeeded in constructing most such behaviors, debugging their constructions in a relatively small number of cycles. An adult’s assistance in noticing relevant features of the problem was necessary for the more complex tasks that involved four complementary rules. The spatial scaffolding afforded by the RoboGan interface was well used by the children, as they consistently used partial backtracking strategies to improve their constructions, and employed modular construction strategies in the more complex tasks. The children’s explanations following their construction usually capped at one rule, or two condition-action couples, one rule short of their final constructions. With respect to tasks that involved describing a demonstrated robot’s behavior, in describing their constructions, explanations tended to be more rule-based, complex and mechanistic. These results are discussed with respect to the importance of making such physical/computational environments available to young children, and support of young children’s learning about such intelligent systems and reasoning in developmentally-advanced forms.

[1]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics , 2005 .

[2]  D. Kuhn Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[3]  Eleonora Bilotta,et al.  Some problems of programming in robotics , 2000, PPIG.

[4]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education , 2009, CHI.

[5]  Children , robotics and problem solving : Technology in the early childhood classroom , .

[6]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives , 2005, CHI.

[7]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[8]  Leonel Morgado,et al.  Radia Perlman - A pioneer of young children computer pro- gramming , 2006 .

[9]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Information Technology and Education: Computer Criticism vs. Technocentric Thinking , 1987 .

[10]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Technologies to support the creation of complex systems models--using StarLogo software with students. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[11]  Kathleen E. Metz Development of explanation: Incremental and fundamental change in children's physics knowledge , 1991 .

[12]  M. Scaife,et al.  “Because a robot's brain hasn't got a brain, it just controls itself” — Children's attributions of brain related behaviour to intelligent artefacts , 1996 .

[13]  David Mioduser,et al.  Approaching Complexity Through Planful Play: Kindergarten Children’s Strategies in Constructing an Autonomous Robot’s Behavior , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[14]  Richard Maddocks Bolts from the blue: how large dreams can become real products , 2000 .

[15]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Metacomponential Development in a Logo Programming Environment , 1990 .

[16]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[17]  Allison Druin,et al.  Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning , 2000 .

[18]  David Mioduser,et al.  Episodes to scripts to rules: concrete-abstractions in kindergarten children’s explanations of a robot’s behavior , 2009 .

[19]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Technologies for lifelong kindergarten , 1998 .

[20]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Twenty Things To Do With A Computer , 1971 .

[21]  Patricia J. Brooks,et al.  Inference and Action in Early Causal Reasoning. , 1996 .

[22]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  A Brief Survey of Distributed Computational Toys , 2007, 2007 First IEEE International Workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL'07).

[23]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Robot entertainment , 2000 .

[24]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  Programming without a computer: a new interface for children under eight , 2000, Proceedings First Australasian User Interface Conference. AUIC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00515).

[25]  Scott A Miller,et al.  Cognitive development, 3rd ed. , 1993 .

[26]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Young Children's Understanding of Animacy and Entertainment Robots , 2006, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[27]  R. Siegler,et al.  Developmental Differences in Rule Learning: A Microgenetic Analysis , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Principle-Based Inferences in Young Children's Categorization: Revisiting the Impact of Function on the Naming of Artifacts. , 1995 .

[29]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Empowering kids to create and share programmable media , 2008, Interactions.

[30]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Perspective-Taking and Object Construction: Two Keys to Learning , 2012 .

[31]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  Students’ Learning with the Connected Chemistry (CC1) Curriculum: Navigating the Complexities of the Particulate World , 2009 .

[32]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[33]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 2010 .

[34]  L. Schauble,et al.  Reasoning about Structure and Function: Children's Conceptions of Gears , 1998 .

[35]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[36]  D. Klahr,et al.  Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Judy Perry,et al.  Using Palm Technology in Participatory Simulations of Complex Systems: A New Take on Ubiquitous and Accessible Mobile Computing , 2005 .

[38]  Paul Bloom Intention, history, and artifact concepts , 1996, Cognition.

[39]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories—An Embodied Modeling Approach , 2006 .

[40]  Mike van Duuren,et al.  Do computers have brains ? What children believe about intelligent artifacts , 1995 .

[41]  D. Klahr Solving Problems with Ambiguous Subgoal Ordering: Preschoolers' Performance. , 1985 .

[42]  M. Alibali,et al.  Children's Thinking , 1986 .

[43]  S. Gelman,et al.  Robots and rodents: children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. , 2007, Child development.

[44]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Logo and development of thinking skills , 1987 .

[45]  Barry S. Fagin,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the effects of robots on introductory Computer Science education , 2002, JERC.

[46]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Log on education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand , 2001, CACM.

[47]  David Mioduser,et al.  Does it “want” or “was it programmed to...”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning , 2008 .

[48]  Luc Steels,et al.  A Learning Zone of One's Own: Sharing Representations and Flow in Collaborative Learning Enviroments , 2004 .

[49]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[50]  Nicola Yelland,et al.  Mindstorms or a storm in a teacup? A review of research with Logo , 1995 .

[51]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[52]  L. Schauble,et al.  Belief revision in children: the role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[53]  Margaret Anne Defeyter,et al.  Acquiring an understanding of design: evidence from children's insight problem solving , 2003, Cognition.

[54]  MICHAEL J. JACOBSON,et al.  Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices , 2001, Complex..

[55]  M. Resnick,et al.  Diving into Complexity: Developing Probabilistic Decentralized Thinking through Role-Playing Activities. , 1998 .

[56]  U. Goswami Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development , 2002 .

[57]  E. Ackermann,et al.  The "Agency" Model of Transactions: Toward an Understanding of Children's Theory of Control. , 1991 .

[58]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Computers Meet Classroom: Classroom Wins , 1993, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[60]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[61]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[62]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[63]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[64]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  The Future of Educational Computing Research:The Case of Computer Programming , 1999 .

[65]  J. Hendler,et al.  PETS: a personal electronic teller of stories , 2000 .

[66]  Lisa Gjedde,et al.  Current developments in technology-assisted education , 2006 .

[67]  Caitlin Kelleher,et al.  Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers , 2005, CSUR.

[68]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .

[69]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  LogoBlocks: A Graphical Programming Language for Interacting with the World , 2000 .

[70]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Information Technology and Education: Computer Criticism vs. Technocentric Thinking , 1987 .

[71]  M. Scaife,et al.  How do children represent intelligent technology? , 1995 .

[72]  K. Crowley,et al.  Searching for Signs of Intelligent Life: An Investigation of Young Children's Beliefs About Robot Intelligence , 2008 .

[73]  Susan Carey,et al.  Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts , 2001, Cognition.

[74]  Rubi Hammer,et al.  Mapping the similarity space of children and adults’ artifact categories , 2003 .