Facial Self-Imitation

Imitation of facial gestures requires the cognitive system to equate the seen-but-unfelt with the felt-but-unseen. Rival accounts propose that this “correspondence problem” is solved either by an innate supramodal mechanism (the active intermodal-mapping, or AIM, model) or by learned, direct links between the corresponding visual and proprioceptive representations of actions (the associative sequence-learning, or ASL, model). Two experiments tested these alternative models using a new technology that permits, for the first time, the automated objective measurement of imitative accuracy. Euclidean distances, measured in image-derived principal component space, were used to quantify the accuracy of adult participants’ attempts to replicate their own facial expressions before, during, and after training. Results supported the ASL model. In Experiment 1, participants reliant solely on proprioceptive feedback got progressively worse at self-imitation. In Experiment 2, participants who received visual feedback that did not match their execution of facial gestures also failed to improve. However, in both experiments, groups that received visual feedback contingent on their execution of facial gestures showed progressive improvement.

[1]  E Abravanel,et al.  Exploring the presence of imitation during early infancy. , 1984, Child development.

[2]  C. Heyes Causes and consequences of imitation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. , 1997, Early development & parenting.

[5]  C. Heyes Where do mirror neurons come from? , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[6]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[7]  J. Nadel,et al.  Human newborns match tongue protrusion of disembodied human and robotic mouths. , 2011, Developmental science.

[8]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  C. Heyes,et al.  Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. , 2011, Developmental science.

[10]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation, Memory, and the Representation of Persons. , 1994, Infant behavior & development.

[11]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Alan Johnston,et al.  Identifying regions that carry the best information about global facial configurations. , 2010, Journal of vision.