Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance

Performing two tasks concurrently is difficult, which has been taken to imply the existence of a structural processing bottleneck. Here we sought to assess whether and to what degree one's multitasking abilities depend on the cognitive-control style one engages in. Participants were primed with creativity tasks that either called for divergent thinking-which were suspected to induce a holistic, flexible task processing mode, or convergent thinking-which were assumed to induce a systematic, focused processing mode. Participants showed reduced cross-talk between tasks and increased task-component switching costs (dual-task costs) for the convergent-thinking group compared to both, a divergent-thinking group and a neutral control group. The results suggest that the cognitive-control style people engage in prior to the task predicts their multitasking performance.

[1]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  B. Hommel,et al.  The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking , 2010, Cognition.

[4]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[5]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of flexible cognitive control in humans , 2010 .

[6]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[8]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence , 2010 .

[9]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  B. Hommel,et al.  Consciousness and Control in Task Switching , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[12]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[15]  H. Pashler,et al.  Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[17]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[18]  N. Taatgen,et al.  Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  B. Hommel.  Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  B. Hommel,et al.  Tailoring perception and action to the task at hand , 2006 .

[21]  Iring Koch,et al.  The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: evidence from manipulating response-code overlap , 2009, Psychological research.

[22]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[23]  T. Goschke,et al.  On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[24]  P. Frensch,et al.  The influence of task instruction on action coding: constraint setting or direct coding? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Markus Heinrichs,et al.  Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF) , 2002 .

[26]  B. Hommel,et al.  Resource sharing in the attentional blink , 2006, Neuroreport.

[27]  B. Hommel,et al.  Cognitive control of convergent and divergent thinking: A control-state approach to human creativity: (636952013-104) , 2013 .

[28]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.