Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization

Motor adaptation is usually defined as the process by which our nervous system produces accurate movements while the properties of our bodies and our environment continuously change. Many experimental and theoretical studies have characterized this process by assuming that the nervous system uses internal models to compensate for motor errors. Here we extend these approaches and construct a probabilistic model that not only compensates for motor errors but estimates the sources of these errors. These estimates dictate how the nervous system should generalize. For example, estimated changes of limb properties will affect movements across the workspace but not movements with the other limb. We provide evidence that many movement-generalization phenomena emerge from a strategy by which the nervous system estimates the sources of our motor errors.

[1]  P J Bairstow,et al.  Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information. , 1970, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[4]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Early stages of load compensation in human aimed arm movements , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[8]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Lackner,et al.  Gravitoinertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[12]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Spatial Generalization from Learning Dynamics of Reaching Movements , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Sainburg Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  MOSAIC Model for Sensorimotor Learning and Control , 2001, Neural Computation.

[19]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[20]  David J Ostry,et al.  Transfer of Motor Learning across Arm Configurations , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Ostry,et al.  Is Interlimb Transfer of Force-Field Adaptation a Cognitive Response to the Sudden Introduction of Load? , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[32]  S. Schaal,et al.  Computational motor control in humans and robots , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  David J Ostry,et al.  Generalization of motor learning based on multiple field exposures and local adaptation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  P. Gribble,et al.  Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  James L Patton,et al.  Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  A. Yuille,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .

[40]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception , 2007, PloS one.

[41]  J. Patton,et al.  Single Limb Performance Following Contralateral Bimanual Limb Training , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[42]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Flexible Representations of Dynamics Are Used in Object Manipulation , 2008, Current Biology.

[45]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor Adaptation as a Process of Reoptimization , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  R. K. Simpson Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .