Experiments of passivity-based bilateral aerial teleoperation of a group of UAVs with decentralized velocity synchronization

In this paper, we present an experimental validation of a novel decentralized passivity-based control strategy for teleoperating a group of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): the slave side, consisting of the UAVs, is endowed with large group autonomy by allowing time-varying topology and interrobot/obstacle collision avoidance. The master side, represented by a human operator, controls the group motion and receives suitable force feedback cues informing her/him about the remote slave motion status. Passivity theory is exploited for guaranteeing stability of the slave side and of the overall teleoperation channel. Results of experiments involving the use of 4 quadcopters are reported and discussed, confirming the soundness of the paper theoretical claims.

[1]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  A passivity-based decentralized approach for the bilateral teleoperation of a group of UAVs with switching topology , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Synchronization of bilateral teleoperators with time delay , 2008, Autom..

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Experiments with a Large Heterogeneous Mobile Robot Team: Exploration, Mapping, Deployment and Detection , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Wei Ren,et al.  Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control , 2007, IEEE Control Systems.

[5]  Dongjun Lee,et al.  Passive-Set-Position-Modulation Framework for Interactive Robotic Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Dusan M. Stipanovic,et al.  Bilateral Teleoperation of Multiple Mobile Agents: Coordinated Motion and Collision Avoidance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Tarek Hamel,et al.  A Control Approach for Thrust-Propelled Underactuated Vehicles and its Application to VTOL Drones , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Planning and control for cooperative manipulation and transportation with aerial robots , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Position Drift Compensation in Port-Hamiltonian Based Telemanipulation , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Autonomous Miniature Flying Robots: COMING SOON! , 2007 .

[11]  René van Paassen,et al.  Artificial Force Field for Haptic Feedback in UAV Teleoperation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[12]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Haptic teleoperation of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles over the internet , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Telemanipulation with Time Delays , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Modeling and control of cooperative teleoperation systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Bilateral Teleoperation of Groups of UAVs with Decentralized Connectivity Maintenance , 2011, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[16]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..