Time Scales of Representation in the Human Brain: Weighing Past Information to Predict Future Events

The estimates that humans make of statistical dependencies in the environment and therefore their representation of uncertainty crucially depend on the integration of data over time. As such, the extent to which past events are used to represent uncertainty has been postulated to vary over the cortex. For example, primary visual cortex responds to rapid perturbations in the environment, while frontal cortices involved in executive control encode the longer term contexts within which these perturbations occur. Here we tested whether primary and executive regions can be distinguished by the number of past observations they represent. This was based on a decay-dependent model that weights past observations from a Markov process and Bayesian Model Selection to test the prediction that neuronal responses are characterized by different decay half-lives depending on location in the brain. We show distributions of brain responses for short and long term decay functions in primary and secondary visual and frontal cortices, respectively. We found that visual and parietal responses are released from the burden of the past, enabling an agile response to fluctuations in events as they unfold. In contrast, frontal regions are more concerned with average trends over longer time scales within which local variations are embedded. Specifically, we provide evidence for a temporal gradient for representing context within the prefrontal cortex and possibly beyond to include primary sensory and association areas.

[1]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[2]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex—An Update Time Is of the Essence , 2001, Neuron.

[4]  E. Koechlin,et al.  The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Science.

[5]  J. Fuster Upper processing stages of the perception–action cycle , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Information theory, novelty and hippocampal responses: unpredicted or unpredictable? , 2005, Neural Networks.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Encoding uncertainty in the hippocampus , 2006, Neural Networks.

[9]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Model‐Based fMRI and Its Application to Reward Learning and Decision Making , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Yi Mao,et al.  Sequential Document Visualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Anterior Prefrontal Function and the Limits of Human Decision-Making , 2007, Science.

[12]  C. Summerfield,et al.  An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Yi Mao,et al.  The Locally Weighted Bag of Words Framework for Document Representation , 2007, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  William D. Penny,et al.  Robust Bayesian general linear models , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Graph-partitioned spatial priors for functional magnetic resonance images , 2008, NeuroImage.

[16]  David Badre,et al.  Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro–caudal organization of the frontal lobes , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements☆ , 2008, Neural Networks.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Influence of Uncertainty and Surprise on Human Corticospinal Excitability during Preparation for Action , 2008, Current Biology.

[19]  M. Botvinick Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  S. Debener,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Fluctuations in the Event-Related Electroencephalogram Reflect Dynamic Changes in the Degree of Surprise , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Two Mechanisms for Task Switching in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Frontiers in Neuroinformatics , 2022 .

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[26]  P. Dayan,et al.  States versus Rewards: Dissociable Neural Prediction Error Signals Underlying Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[27]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention , 2010, Neural Networks.

[28]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Prior Information in Perceptual Decision Making: A Model-Based Analysis , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  William D. Penny,et al.  Bayesian model selection maps for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Computational and dynamic models in neuroimaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Model-based analyses: Promises, pitfalls, and example applications to the study of cognitive control , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.