A theoretical perspective on social agency

In interacting with artificial social agents, novel forms of sociality between humans and machines emerge. The theme of Social Agency between humans and robots is of emerging importance. In this paper key theoretical issues are discussed in a preliminary exploration of the concept. We try to understand what Social Agency is and how it is created by, negotiated with, and attributed to artificial agents. This is done in particular considering socially situated robots and by exploring how people recognize and accept social agents. The interplay between humans and agents is investigated through dynamics of interpretation, signification and attribution. The ultimate goal of this research is to explore the challenges and opportunities brought by the design of socially intelligent agents.

[1]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine , 1966, CACM.

[2]  A. Leslie.  Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[3]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Playthings that do things: a young kid's "incredibles"! , 2005, IDC '05.

[4]  Lira Nikolovska,et al.  Exploratory Design, Augmented Furniture? , 2009 .

[5]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Sociable robot systems for real-world problems , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[6]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Exploring the design space of robots: Children's perspectives , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[7]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Infants' understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychology. , 1995 .

[8]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Can robots be used as a vehicle for the projection of socially sensitive issues? Exploring children's attitudes towards robots through stories , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[9]  John Dixon,et al.  The Design of Future Things , 2010 .

[10]  T. Shibata,et al.  Engaging with artificial pets , 2005 .

[11]  Eduardo Kac.  Towards a Chronology of Robotic Art , 2001 .

[12]  Patrizia Marti,et al.  Experiencing the flow: design issues in human-robot interaction , 2005, sOc-EUSAI '05.

[13]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  L. Suchman.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[15]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  Agency, tangible technology and young children , 2007, IDC.

[16]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Embodied social interaction for robots , 2005 .

[17]  M. Mori.  The Buddha in the robot , 1981 .

[18]  S. Baron-Cohen.  Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[19]  Francesca Giardini,et al.  Behavioral Implicit Communication for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004 .

[20]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  What is a Human? - Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  P. Marti,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics in the Treatment of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[22]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[23]  Steve Torrance,et al.  Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[24]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[25]  What Imitation Tells Us About Social Cognition , 2003 .

[26]  Peter Galison,et al.  The science studies reader , 1999 .

[27]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  An enactive approach to social cognition , 2007 .

[28]  E. Edmonds.  Interactive Art , 2011 .

[29]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges , 2004 .

[30]  Christine Schöpf.  Prix Ars Electronica , 1998 .

[31]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[32]  Gérard Bailly,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence - innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies, sOc-EUSAI '05, Grenoble, France, October 12-14, 2005 , 2005, sOc-EUSAI.

[33]  Patrizia Marti,et al.  Interpretative Dynamics in Human Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[34]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[35]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[36]  Donald A. Norman.  Robots in the home: what might they do? , 2005, INTR.

[37]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  and Machine , 1977 .

[38]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Building artificial humans to understand humans , 2007, Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs.

[39]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Participatory sense-making , 2007 .

[40]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .