Human-robot physical interaction and collaboration using an industrial robot with a closed control architecture

In physical Human-Robot Interaction, the basic problem of fast detection and safe robot reaction to unexpected collisions has been addressed successfully on advanced research robots that are torque controlled, possibly equipped with joint torque sensors, and for which an accurate dynamic model is available. In this paper, an end-user approach to collision detection and reaction is presented for an industrial manipulator having a closed control architecture and no additional sensors. The proposed detection and reaction schemes have minimal requirements: only the outer joint velocity reference to the robot manufacturer's controller is used, together with the available measurements of motor currents and joint positions. No a priori information on the robot dynamic model and existing low-level joint controllers is strictly needed. A suitable on-line processing of the motor currents allows to distinguish between accidental collisions and intended human-robot contacts, so as to switch the robot to a collaboration mode when needed. Two examples of reaction schemes for collaboration are presented, with the user pushing/pulling the robot at any point of its structure (e.g., for manual guidance) or with a compliant-like robot behavior in response to forces applied by the human. The actual performance of the methods is illustrated through experiments on a KUKA KR5 manipulator.

[1]  Dominik Henrich,et al.  Velocity control for safe robot guidance based on fused vision and force/torque data , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems.

[2]  Anders Robertsson,et al.  Force controlled robotic assembly without a force sensor , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Dominik Henrich,et al.  Fast vision-based minimum distance determination between known and unkown objects , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Alexander Zelinsky,et al.  Quantitative Safety Guarantees for Physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  An atlas of physical human-robot interaction , 2008 .

[7]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A depth space approach to human-robot collision avoidance , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Collision detection system for manipulator based on adaptive impedance control law , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On the Passivity-Based Impedance Control of Flexible Joint Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Robots with Flexible Elements , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[13]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS) , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Yoji Yamada,et al.  A failure-to-safety "Kyozon" system with simple contact detection and stop capabilities for safe human-autonomous robot coexistence , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[16]  Marcelo H. Ang,et al.  Dynamic Model Identification for Industrial Robots , 2009 .

[17]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Safety for Physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[19]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Integrated control for pHRI: Collision avoidance, detection, reaction and collaboration , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[20]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Human-Intent Detection and Physically Interactive Control of a Robot Without Force Sensors , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.