Camera Placement Considering Occlusion for Robust Motion Capture

In multi-camera tracking systems, camera placement can have a significant impact on the overall performance. In feature-based motion capture systems, degradation can come from two major sources, low image resolution and target occlusion. In order to achieve better tracking and automate the camera placement process, a quantitative metric to evaluate the quality of multi-camera configurations is needed. We propose a quality metric that estimates the error caused by both image resolution and occlusion.. It includes a probabilistic occlusion model that reflects the dynamic self-occlusion of the target. Using this metric, we show the impact of occlusion on optimal camera pose by analyzing several camera configurations. Finally, we show camera placement examples that demonstrate how this metric can be applied toward the automatic design of more accurate and robust tracking systems.

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  Automatic camera placement for image-based modeling , 1999, Proceedings. Seventh Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications (Cat. No.PR00293).

[3]  Roger Mohr,et al.  Optimal camera placement to obtain accurate 3D point positions , 1997, Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98EX170).

[4]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Analysis of uncertainty bounds due to quantization for three-dimensional position estimation using multiple cameras , 1998 .

[5]  Andreas Zell,et al.  EvA: a tool for optimization with evolutionary algorithms , 1997, EUROMICRO 97. Proceedings of the 23rd EUROMICRO Conference: New Frontiers of Information Technology (Cat. No.97TB100167).

[6]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Automatic camera placement for robot vision tasks , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Konstantinos A. Tarabanis,et al.  A survey of sensor planning in computer vision , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Konstantinos A. Tarabanis,et al.  The MVP sensor planning system for robotic vision tasks , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot motion planning , 1970, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[10]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Automatic sensor and light source positioning for machine vision , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[11]  J. O'Rourke Art gallery theorems and algorithms , 1987 .