Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition

Human perception and memory are often explained as optimal statistical inferences that are informed by accurate prior probabilities. In contrast, cognitive judgments are usually viewed as following error-prone heuristics that are insensitive to priors. We examined the optimality of human cognition in a more realistic context than typical laboratory studies, asking people to make predictions about the duration or extent of everyday phenomena such as human life spans and the box-office take of movies. Our results suggest that everyday cognitive judgments follow the same optimal statistical principles as perception and memory, and reveal a close correspondence between people's implicit probabilistic models and the statistics of the world.

[1]  L. M. M.-T..  Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[2]  Estes Wk.  The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[3]  R. Faure,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1968 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[5]  F. S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction to Operations Research, 10th ed. , 1986 .

[6]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[7]  R. Siegler.  The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[8]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[9]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[11]  J. Gott.  Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects , 1993, Nature.

[12]  William T. Freeman,et al.  The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception , 1994, Nature.

[13]  John Maddox,et al.  Star masses and bayesian probability , 1994, Nature.

[14]  Nick Chater,et al.  A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. , 1994 .

[15]  J. Richard Gott.  Future prospects discussed , 1994, Nature.

[16]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Bayesian Modeling of Human Concept Learning , 1998, NIPS.

[18]  Carlton M. Caves,et al.  Predicting future duration from present age: A critical assessment , 2000, astro-ph/0001414.

[19]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Perception and preference in short-term word priming. , 2001, Psychological review.

[21]  Martin Crowder,et al.  Lifetime prediction from only present age: fact or fiction? , 2001 .

[22]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Craig R. M. McKenzie,et al.  Rational models as theories – not standards – of behavior , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  James Surowiecki.  The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[27]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[28]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[29]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Structure and strength in causal induction , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.