Risk Estimation in Robotics and the Impact of Human Behaviour

Within this chapter the emerging topic of automated risk assessment in a domestic scene is discussed, state of the art techniques are reviewed followed by developed methodologies which focus on safer human and robotic interactions with an environment. By using the risk estimation framework, the notion of a quantitative risk score is presented. Hazards within a scene are evaluated and measured using risk elements which provide a numeric representation of specific types of risk. Emphasis is given to the concept of risk as a result of interaction with an environment, specifically whether human or robotic actions in a scene can effect overall risk. To this end, techniques which simulate human or robotic behaviour with regard to risk in an environment are reviewed. Specifically the ideas of interaction and visibility are addressed defining risk in terms of areas within a scene that are visited most often and which are least visible. As with any behaviour simulation techniques, validation of their accuracy is required and a number of simulation evaluation techniques are reviewed. Finally a conclusion as to the current state of automated risk assessment is given, with a brief look at the future of the research area.

[1]  Shuqiang Guo,et al.  Camera Pose Estimation Using Frequency Analysis , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA).

[2]  Glenn Reinman,et al.  Scenario space: characterizing coverage, quality, and failure of steering algorithms , 2011, SCA '11.

[3]  Z. Zivkovic Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction , 2004, ICPR 2004.

[4]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Scene Understanding by Reasoning Stability and Safety , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Cherif Foudil,et al.  Path finding and Collision Avoidance in Crowd Simulation , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Technol..

[6]  José Ruíz Ascencio,et al.  Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: a survey , 2012, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[7]  Belén Curto,et al.  A Real-time Door Detection System for Domestic Robotic Navigation , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[8]  Kenneth Tze Kin Teo,et al.  Kalman filtering based object tracking in surveillance video system , 2011 .

[9]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  Analyzing Stop-and-Go Waves by Experiment and Modeling , 2011 .

[10]  Franziska Klügl-Frohnmeyer,et al.  Agent-Based Pedestrian Simulation of Train Evacuation Integrating Environmental Data , 2009, KI.

[11]  Daniel Asmar,et al.  Scaled Monocular Visual SLAM , 2016 .

[12]  N. Grassly,et al.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/population Division , 2022 .

[13]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Secrets of optical flow estimation and their principles , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Helen Sutherland,et al.  The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents , 1950 .

[15]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Selection Algorithm for Locomotion Based on the Evaluation of Falling Risk , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Antoni Ligeza Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach: By Stuart Russell and Peter Norwig. ISBN# 0-13-103805-2, pp. 932 + 28. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995 , 1995 .

[17]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Histograms of oriented optical flow and Binet-Cauchy kernels on nonlinear dynamical systems for the recognition of human actions , 2009, CVPR.

[18]  Robert C. Cook,et al.  World Population Prospects , 1966 .

[19]  Yiorgos Chrysanthou,et al.  A Data‐Driven Framework for Visual Crowd Analysis , 2014, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[20]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera , 2011, UIST.

[21]  Vasileios Argyriou,et al.  3D Voxel HOG and Risk Estimation , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP).

[22]  Georgios Tzimiropoulos,et al.  Risk analysis for smart homes and domestic robots using robust shape and physics descriptors, and complex boosting techniques , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[23]  H. Selye The Stress of Life , 1958 .

[24]  D. Helbing,et al.  Self-Organization Phenomena in Pedestrian Crowds , 1998, cond-mat/9806152.

[25]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  State-of-the-art crowd motion simulation models , 2013 .

[26]  Georgios Tzimiropoulos,et al.  A 3D Scene Analysis Framework and Descriptors for Risk Evaluation , 2015, 2015 International Conference on 3D Vision.

[27]  Yongtae Do,et al.  On the neural computation of the scale factor in perspective transformation camera model , 2013, 2013 10th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA).

[28]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Interactive simulation of dynamic crowd behaviors using general adaptation syndrome theory , 2012, I3D '12.

[29]  Torsten Sattler,et al.  Camera Pose Voting for Large-Scale Image-Based Localization , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[30]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[31]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Complex-Valued Signal Processing: The Proper Way to Deal With Impropriety , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[33]  Takamasa Iryo,et al.  A Pedestrian Model Considering Anticipatory Behaviour for Capacity Evaluation , 2009 .

[34]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.