Experiencing and handling the diversity in data density and environmental locality in an indoor positioning service

Diversity in training data density and environment locality is intrinsic in the real-world deployment of indoor localization systems and has a major impact on the performance of existing localization approaches. In this paper, through micro-benchmarks, we find that fingerprint-based approaches are preferable in scenarios where a dense database is available; while model-based approaches are the method of choice in the case of sparse data. It should be noted, however, that practical situations are complex. A single deployment often features both sparse and dense sampled areas. Furthermore, the internal layout affects the propagation of radio signals and exhibits environmental impacts. A certain number of measurement samples may be sufficient for one part of the building, but entirely insufficient for another. Thus, finding the right indoor localization algorithm for a given large-scale deployment is challenging, if not impossible; there is no one-size-fits-all indoor localization approach. Realizing the fundamental fact that the quality of the location database capturing the actual radio map dictates localization accuracy, in this paper, we propose Modellet, an algorithmic approach that optimally approximates the actual radio map by unifying model-based and fingerprint-based approaches. Modellet represents the radio map using a fingerprint-cloud that incorporates both measured real fingerprints and virtual fingerprints, which are computed from models with a local support, based on the key concept of the supporting set. We evaluate Modellet with data collected from an office building as well as 13 large-scale deployment venues (shopping malls and airports), located across China, U.S., and Germany. Comparing Modellet with two representative baseline approaches, RADAR and EZPerfect, demonstrates that Modellet effectively adapts to different data densities and environmental conditions, substantially outperforming existing approaches.

[1]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[2]  Colin L. Mallows,et al.  A system for LEASE: location estimation assisted by stationary emitters for indoor RF wireless networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[3]  Oscar Mayora-Ibarra,et al.  Tuning to your position: FM radio based indoor localization with spontaneous recalibration , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[4]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Locating in fingerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human intervention , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[5]  Jie Xiong,et al.  ArrayTrack: A Fine-Grained Indoor Location System , 2011, NSDI.

[6]  Prathima Agrawal,et al.  ARIADNE: a dynamic indoor signal map construction and localization system , 2006, MobiSys '06.

[7]  Luís Felipe M. de Moraes,et al.  Calibration-free WLAN location system based on dynamic mapping of signal strength , 2006, MobiWac '06.

[8]  Ravi Jain,et al.  Error characteristics and calibration-free techniques for wireless LAN-based location estimation , 2004, MobiWac '04.

[9]  Joel Barnes,et al.  Hybrid Method for Localization Using WLAN , 2005 .

[10]  Richard P. Martin,et al.  The limits of localization using signal strength: a comparative study , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..

[11]  Richard P. Martin,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of the Limits on Localization Using Signal Strength , 2009, 2009 6th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[12]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[13]  Injong Rhee,et al.  FM-based indoor localization via automatic fingerprint DB construction and matching , 2013, MobiSys '13.

[14]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[15]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  WLAN location determination via clustering and probability distributions , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2003. (PerCom 2003)..

[16]  Tom Minka,et al.  You are facing the Mona Lisa: spot localization using PHY layer information , 2012, MobiSys '12.

[17]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  Implications of device diversity for organic localization , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[18]  Peter A. Dinda,et al.  Indoor localization without infrastructure using the acoustic background spectrum , 2011, MobiSys '11.

[19]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM ’00) The Cricket Location-Support System , 2022 .

[20]  Yin Chen,et al.  FM-based indoor localization , 2012, MobiSys '12.

[21]  Xiaolin Li,et al.  Guoguo: enabling fine-grained indoor localization via smartphone , 2013, MobiSys '13.

[22]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Indoor localization without the pain , 2010, MobiCom.

[23]  Stefan Savage,et al.  On the empirical performance of self-calibrating WiFi location systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[24]  Ig-Jae Kim,et al.  Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism , 2011, MobiSys '11.

[25]  Mike Y. Chen,et al.  Practical Metropolitan-Scale Positioning for GSM Phones , 2006, UbiComp.

[26]  Guobin Shen,et al.  Walkie-Markie: Indoor Pathway Mapping Made Easy , 2013, NSDI.

[27]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Centaur: locating devices in an office environment , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[28]  John Platt,et al.  Minimizing Calibration Effort for an Indoor 802.11 Device Location Measurement System , 2003 .

[29]  Anshul Rai,et al.  Zee: zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[30]  Guobin Shen,et al.  Pharos: enable physical analytics through visible light based indoor localization , 2013, HotNets.

[31]  Shih-Hau Fang,et al.  Calibration-Free Approaches for Robust Wi-Fi Positioning against Device Diversity: A Performance Comparison , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[32]  Romit Roy Choudhury,et al.  SurroundSense: mobile phone localization via ambience fingerprinting , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[33]  Luis E. Ortiz,et al.  WiGEM: a learning-based approach for indoor localization , 2011, CoNEXT '11.

[34]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  Zero-Configuration, Robust Indoor Localization: Theory and Experimentation , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[35]  Jie Yang,et al.  Push the limit of WiFi based localization for smartphones , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[36]  Feng Zhao,et al.  A reliable and accurate indoor localization method using phone inertial sensors , 2012, UbiComp.

[37]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  The Horus WLAN location determination system , 2005, MobiSys '05.

[38]  A. S. Krishnakumar,et al.  Bayesian indoor positioning systems , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[39]  Oscar Mayora-Ibarra,et al.  FM radio for indoor localization with spontaneous recalibration , 2010, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[40]  Dileeka Dias,et al.  Integration of fingerprinting and trilateration techniques for improved indoor localization , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks - (WOCN).