Understanding Human Response to the Presence and Actions of Unmanned Ground Vehicle Systems in Field Environment

The objective of this research was to investigate how humans would respond to unmanned ground vehicles (UGV) operating in their environment. These environments included a shopping mall, two different sports complexes, and a university campus setting. The field study included video observations of 784 pedestrians. Additionally, survey data were collected and matched to 115 pedestrian observations. The field evaluations were conducted over a period of six weeks at the four locations. The results indicate that of the 784 pedestrians observed, 63.5% took time to observe the robot, 30.6% ignored the robot, and 5.9% stopped and interacted with the robot. Based on the individual results from the 115 pedestrians that completed the survey, those who indicated having positive feelings (e.g., strong, comfortable, excited) had an increased likelihood of interacting with the UGV. If the pedestrian had owned a dog they were more likely to interact with the robot. Pedestrians traveling in groups were also more likely to stop and interact with the robot than those traveling alone. The results from this field research will be used in the near future to inform the development of a pedestrian model to include responses to robots that may be in the environment, and could also be used to inform design features for UGVs. As robots continue to become more prevalent in society, it is important to consider how humans will interact with them when encountered.

[1]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[4]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Robovie as a Mascot: A Qualitative Study for Long-Term Presence of Robots in a Shopping Mall , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[5]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  A spatial model of engagement for a social robot , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[6]  Jaroslav Rozman,et al.  SmartMowers as a part of a SmartCity , 2016, 2016 17th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC).

[7]  B. Gates A robot in every home. , 2007, Scientific American.

[8]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Cross-Cultural Studies on Subjective Evaluation of a Seal Robot , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[9]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Design for Acceptability: Improving Robots’ Coexistence in Human Society , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Toward human-robot collaboration in surgery: Performance assessment of human and robotic agents in an inclusion segmentation task , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[11]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  A personalized robot companion? - The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[12]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  An Behavior-based Robotics , 1998 .

[14]  Rajesh Elara Mohan,et al.  Design principles for robot inclusive spaces: A case study with Roomba , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[15]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Benefits and problems of health‐care robots in aged care settings: A comparison trial , 2016, Australasian journal on ageing.

[16]  Elio Sancristobal Ruiz,et al.  Robotics, the New Industrial Revolution , 2012, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[17]  Howie Choset,et al.  Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  An Overview of Humans and Autonomy for Military Environments: Safety, Types of Autonomy, Agents, and User Interfaces , 2013, HCI.

[19]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Navigation in the presence of humans , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[20]  David Lee,et al.  The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[21]  Niklas Bergström,et al.  Modeling of natural human-robot encounters , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Bengisu Tulu,et al.  A taxonomy for user-healthcare robot interaction , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Robots in Society, Society in Robots , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[24]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, Benefits, and Concerns , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  T. Kanda,et al.  Why do children abuse robots , 2016 .

[26]  Ho Seok Ahn,et al.  Entertainment services of a healthcare robot system for older people in private and public spaces , 2015, 2015 6th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA).

[27]  Arun Vishwanath,et al.  An Examination of the Factors Contributing to Adoption Decisions among Late-Diffused Technology Products , 2003, New Media Soc..

[28]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[29]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[30]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Cultural Differences in Attitudes Towards Robots , 2005 .

[31]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  Suleman Shahid,et al.  Floffy: Designing an Outdoor Robot for Children , 2013, INTERACT.

[33]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression , 2015, HCI.

[34]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[35]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Exploring the role of robots in home organization , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[36]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  “Teach Me–Show Me”—End-User Personalization of a Smart Home and Companion Robot , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[38]  Tomás Svoboda,et al.  TRADR Project: Long-Term Human-Robot Teaming for Robot Assisted Disaster Response , 2015, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[39]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Will I bother here? - A robot anticipating its influence on pedestrian walking comfort , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[40]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Looking Forward to a “Robotic Society”? , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[41]  Erika Rogers Human-Robot Interaction , 2004 .

[42]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Towards a Socially Acceptable Collision Avoidance for a Mobile Robot Navigating Among Pedestrians Using a Pedestrian Model , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[43]  E. Hall The hidden dimension: an anthropologist examines man's use of space in public and private , 1969 .

[44]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[45]  Ho Seok Ahn,et al.  Healthcare robot systems for a hospital environment: CareBot and ReceptionBot , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[46]  Yutaka Takase,et al.  Motion generation for the stuffed-toy robot , 2013, The SICE Annual Conference 2013.

[47]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  A Literature Review on New Robotics: Automation from Love to War , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[48]  Pierre Payeur,et al.  Safe Close-Proximity and Physical Human-Robot Interaction Using Industrial Robots , 2015, 2015 12th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision.

[49]  Katsutoshi Itoyama,et al.  Audio-visual beat tracking based on a state-space model for a music robot dancing with humans , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[50]  Eleanor Sandry,et al.  Re-evaluating the Form and Communication of Social Robots , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[51]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf An Ethical Evaluation of Human–Robot Relationships , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[52]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[53]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Evaluation of Passing Distance for Social Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[54]  James E. Katz,et al.  Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[55]  Jamshed Iqbal,et al.  Robotics for Nuclear Power Plants — Challenges and future perspectives , 2012, 2012 2nd International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI).

[56]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Enabling personalised medical support for chronic disease management through a hybrid robot-cloud approach , 2017, Auton. Robots.

[57]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Working together with industrial robots: Experiencing robots in a production environment , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[58]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[59]  Daniel Kanaan,et al.  Robot for investigations and assessments of nuclear areas , 2015, 2015 4th International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA).

[60]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[61]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human–Robot Interaction , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[62]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[63]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[64]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[65]  Alan R. Wagner,et al.  Building and Maintaining Trust Between Humans and Guidance Robots in an Emergency , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Trust and Autonomous Systems.

[66]  Dylan F. Glas,et al.  How to Approach Humans?-Strategies for Social Robots to Initiate Interaction- , 2010 .

[67]  James McVay,et al.  An affordable, robust mining inspection robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM).

[68]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[69]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Is a robot an appliance, teammate, or friend? age-related differences in expectations of and attitudes towards personal home-based robots , 2008 .

[70]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[71]  J. Gentry,et al.  Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers , 1983 .

[72]  Marcel Heerink,et al.  Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).