Distinguishing Three Accounts of Situation Awareness based on their Domains of Origin

Review of the literature reveals that different treatments and applications of situation awareness (SA) theories and measures often include reference to, or verification from, specific domains. This leads to the postulate that the application domain from which a conceptualization of SA arises plays a fundamental role in that conceptualization. To test this postulate, we compare SA accounts originating from three different domains -aviation, military command and control, and process control. The comparison of the three SA accounts illustrates that the domain of origin can have significant influence on the fundamental characterization of SA. In particular, the choices for the research paradigm in psychology, cognitive components (e.g., metacognition), orientation of time, and scaling of time can be partly traced back to properties or operator challenges specific to the domains of origin. Our comparison demonstrates that domain properties must be carefully examined for conceptualization and application of the SA notion.

[1]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[3]  F. Lichacz Augmenting understanding of the relationship between situation awareness and confidence using calibration analysis , 2008, Ergonomics.

[4]  J. Funke Complex Problem Solving , 2012 .

[5]  David J Bryant,et al.  Critique, Explore, Compare, and Adapt (CECA): A New Model for Command Decision Making , 2003 .

[6]  Andrew R. Dattel,et al.  Does Situation Awareness Add to the Validity of Cognitive Tests? , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[7]  E. Jeannot,et al.  The Development of Situation Awareness Measures in ATM Systems , 2003 .

[8]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  The role of situation awareness for understanding signalling and control in rail operations , 2010 .

[9]  Craig A. Kaplan,et al.  In search of insight , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  P. Frensch,et al.  Complex problem solving : the European perspective , 1995 .

[11]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Complex Problem Solving : Principles and Mechanisms , 1992 .

[13]  Trina C. Kershaw,et al.  Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Janet E. Davidson,et al.  The role of metacognition in problem solving , 1994 .

[15]  David N. Hogg,et al.  Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms , 1995 .

[16]  Francesco Cara,et al.  Emerging expertise in process control , 1999 .

[17]  Richard H. Mogford,et al.  Mental Models and Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control , 1997 .

[18]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Cognitive processes in well‐defined and ill‐defined problem solving , 1995 .

[19]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[20]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[21]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .